Dadabhau Vilas Shelke v. the State of Maharashtra Trough Its Secretary and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Batch adjournment order dated 22.08.2025, Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench), coram Manish Pitale & Y.G. Khobragade, JJ.; numerous matters adjourned for paucity of time to 12.09.2025, 20.09.2025, 26.09.2025, 03.10.2025 and 07.11.2025 to 21.11.2025; includes Civil Application Nos. 2527, 2806, 5273, 8940, 8946, 8975-9114 of 2025, Writ Petitions (e.g., 10950/2023, 1872/2003, 12007/2019, 1006/2023, 1978/2025, 3083/2019), PIL 46/2023, Review Application (Civil) 189/2025, Income Tax Appeal 41/2024, Commercial Appeal 2/2019; directions: remove office objections, file reply/rejoinder affidavits, ad-interim orders to continue until next date; State counsel: G.P. A.B. Girase and Addl. G.P.s S.D. Ghayal, V.M. Kagne, Saie S. Joshi, S.P. Sonpawale, Neha B. Kamble, S.V. Hange.
What did the court decide?
All matters listed in the order were adjourned to the dates mentioned against them (ranging from 12.09.2025 to 21.11.2025) due to paucity of time; office objections to be removed before the next date; affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, to be filed on or before the next date; ad-interim orders, if any, passed earlier, to continue until the next date.