Disposed¶11
Jagannath Bhaurao Kalam and Another v. the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Others
Bombay HCCA/659/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Aurangabad Bench, Bombay High Court; batch of 2025 writ petitions (356 and connected: 814, 1574, 1982, 1993, 2003, 2259, 2280, 2281, 2289, 2850) with Civil Applications 258/2025 (in WPST/26313/2023) and 659/2025 (in WP/14085/2023); per curiam order of 17.03.2025 by Patil and Khobragade, JJ.; await service on respondents for four weeks; private service permitted; continuation of earlier interim relief; purely procedural/interlocutory order, no merits decided, no statute or precedent cited.
What did the court decide?
Time of four weeks granted for service on the respective respondents; leave granted to serve the unserved respondents privately; interim relief, if any, granted earlier to continue till then. Matters otherwise kept pending; no merits adjudicated. ¶11