Arun Kumar Sharma and Anr. v. Anandrao v Chatim and 3 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court, Goa Bench; Civil Application 38 of 2025 in First Appeal 27 of 2025; stay of operation of impugned judgment and decree; costs of Rs.47,729/- to Respondent Nos. 1 and 2; stay conditional on deposit within five weeks; prayer clause (a) partly rejected; prayer clause (b) rejected due to dismissal of temporary-injunction application by order dated 11.07.2023 during pendency of suit; leave to amend relief-clause date (03.05.2025 to 03.04.2025); Arun Kumar Sharma appellant in person; S. D. Lotlikar Senior Advocate and Veena Govekar for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2; Shivdatt P. Munj Additional Government Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4; Valmiki Menezes J.; application disposed of.
What did the court decide?
Partial stay of the impugned Judgment and Decree limited to its direction for payment of costs of Rs.47,729/- in favour of Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, conditional on the Appellant depositing that sum within five weeks; leave to amend the date in the relief clause granted; the balance of prayer clause (a) and prayer clause (b) rejected.