The Executive Engineer Minor Irrigation Division Osmanabad and Others v. Gorakh Tukaram Deshmukh
Case brief
What is this about?
Batch service-of-notice order, High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, 30 July 2025, Shailesh P. Brahme, Judge (per court). Matters covered: FIRST APPEAL NO. 2779 OF 2024 - Majidkhan Daudkhan Pathan and Anr v Ruksanabi Mard Abdulwahab Jahagirdar and Ors (with CA 12173/2024); FIRST APPEAL NO. 910 OF 2025 - Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd through Manager v Sujata Ravindra Aher and Others (with CA 5467/2025); FIRST APPEAL NO. 911 OF 2025 - Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd through Manager v Yash Ravindra Aher and Others (with CA 5472/2025); FIRST APPEAL NO. 1230 OF 2025 - Jyoti Jitendra Kumawat v Jitendra Kailas Kumawat and Ors (with CA 5795/2025); CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13203 OF 2024 IN FAST/27002/2024 - Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Osmanabad and Others v Gorakh Tukaram Deshmukh (with CA 13204/2024); CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1413 OF 2025 IN FAST/30042/2024 - Salman Khan Shamsherkhan Pathan v MHOD. Gous s/o Mohd. Ismail and Anr; CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4777 OF 2025 IN FAST/2770/2025 - Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Osmanabad Dist Osmanabad v Ganpati Sadhu Rajguru and Ors (with CAs 4778, 4780, 4779 of 2025); CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5442 OF 2025 IN FAST/14214/2025 - State of Maharshtra, S.L.A.O. Jayakwadi Project No. 2 through Executive Engineer v Krishnarao Damodarrao Joshi (died) thr LRs Kshitija Anjali Avinash Pathak and Ors (with CA 5443/2025); SECOND APPEAL NO. 141 OF 2025 - Maroti Limbaji Gaikwad and Ors v Indrabai Sahebrao Bevale (died) thr LRs Ranabai Baburao Kundkar and Ors (with CA 2966/2025); CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1035 OF 2025 IN SAST/2269/2025 - Limbaji Devidas Bhatane v Angad Laxman Bhatane and Ors (with CA 1036/2025). Directions: six weeks to take steps against dead and unserved respondents; notices on fresh addresses returnable after six weeks; re-issue of unserved notices (technical reasons) returnable six weeks thereafter; six-week extension on want-of-time remark; interim relief, if any, continues till next date; private service permitted. No statutes or precedents cited; no substantive adjudication; not suitable as a precedent citation.