Rushikesh Ramchandra Aher v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Administrative common order of the Bombay High Court (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction), Ashwin D. Bhobe, J., dated 13.08.2025: hearing of the listed criminal appellate matters was deferred for want of time; office objections to be removed within two weeks; existing ad-interim/interim orders continued subject to compliance; affidavits in reply/rejoinder to be filed before the next date; matters listed 'For Admission' on 12/09/2025 (Serial Nos. 24 to 26, 29, 30, 33, 35, 37 to 39) and 13/08/2025 (Serial Nos. 44 to 47, 51, 54 to 57, 59 to 62 & 65); first-listed party indicated in the running header as Gayatri Shimpi. Of procedural value only (interim-order continuation and listing status); no statute or precedent is cited and no legal issue is determined.
What did the court decide?
Hearing of the listed criminal appellate matters deferred for paucity of time; all office objections to be removed within two weeks; ad-interim/interim orders, if any, granted earlier to continue subject to such compliance; affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, to be filed before the next date; matters listed 'For Admission' on 12/09/2025 and 13/08/2025 as per the chart.