Sahil Sunil Pawar v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC19 Mar 2025BA/701/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Sahil Sunil Pawar; The State of Maharashtra; Criminal Bail Application No. 701 of 2025; Bombay High Court; Milind N. Jadhav, J.; regular bail; Section 439 CrPC 1973; C.R. No. 731 of 2024; Ulhasnagar Police Station; IPC Sections 307, 323, 364, 504, 506, 143, 144, 147, 149; Arms Act Sections 4 and 25; Maharashtra Police Act Sections 37(1) and 135; incident 26.05.2024; parity with co-accused; sword; CCTV footage; simple head injury; grievous hip injury; S.R. Pille; S.G. Gemnani; Rajeshree V. Newton APP; adjourned to 19 March 2025; order dated 20 February 2025.

What the court decided

AI extract

Sahil Sunil Pawar vs State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2025)

¶1

24.BA.701.25.doc

¶2

Ajay

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 701 OF 2025

¶5

Sahil Sunil Pawar .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent

¶6

Mr. S.R. Pille a/w. S.G. Gemnani, Advocates for Applicant.

¶7

Ms. Rajeshree V. Newton, APP for Respondent – State.

¶8

CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 20, 2025.

¶9

P.C.:

¶10

1. Heard Mr. Pille, learned Advocate for Applicant and Ms. Newton, learned APP for Respondent – State.

¶11

2. This is an Application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking Regular Bail in connection with C.R.No.731 of 2024 registered with Ulhasnagar Police Station 307, 323, 364, 504, 506, 143, 144, 147 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 and Sections 37(1) and 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951. Date of the incident is 26.05.2024.

¶12

3. Mr. Pille would submit that save and except Applicant other 6 accused have been already enlarged on bail. He would submit that injured victim suffered two injuries which are documented in the

¶13

1 of 2

¶14

24.BA.701.25.doc

¶15

medical certificate. One is simple injury on the head and another is a grievous injury on the hip. In so far as role of the Applicant is concerned, his role is attributable to him using a sword in the commission of the offence. However he would submit that CCTV footage has been collected and witness statements have been recorded which do not support the prosecution case that the alleged weapon i.e. sword was ever used by any person.

¶16

4. That apart, he would submit that head injury suffered by the injured victim for which the Applicant has been held responsible is a simple injury as qualified by the injury certificate appended at page No.164 of the Application. He would submit that on parity, Applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

¶17

5. Ms. Newton is directed to take appropriate instructions from the concerned Investigating Officer and apprise the Court on the next adjourned date when this Court shall hear the Application.

¶18

6. Stand over to 19^th March, 2025 at 02:30 p.m .

¶19

[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]

¶20

Ajay

¶21

Digitally signed by AJAY AJAY TRAMBAK TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE UGALMUGALE Date: 2025.02.20 18:19:27 +0530

¶22

2 of 2

Sahil Sunil Pawar v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Sahil Sunil Pawar v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Balan Rama Ayyar vs Late Subramonya Ayyar Alias Subramonya A.R. Ayyar (Deceased)

Deepak Jijaba Sonawane vs Nanda Jijaba Sonawane(Deceased)

Jaymala Gopalkrishna Gavande vs Vikas Gopalkrishna Gavande (Deceased No 1)

Nivan Ankit Modi through Its Legal Guardian Mr Ankit Yogendra Modi vs Rajendra Brajlal Modi

Salman Kayyum Shaikh vs the State of Maharashtra

Pravin Mahadev Helkar vs State of Maharashtra