Disposed¶18

Yuvraj Bajrang Kamthe v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC21 Feb 2025BA/611/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application under S.483 BNSS 2023 disposed of on the learned APP's statements that the applicant was never arrested in C.R. No.241/2017 (Sangli City Police Station; Sessions Case No.20 of 2019; offences u/ss 166, 137, 177, 182, 193, 195(A), 201, 202, 203, 211, 217, 218 r/w S.34 IPC) and that the Investigating Officer does not need his custody; notice dated 11.07.2018 to cooperate with investigation marked 'X'.

What did the court decide?

No bail order as such; the bail application was disposed of on the basis of the learned APP's statements that the Applicant was not arrested in the crime and that the Investigating Officer does not need his custody. ¶18

Yuvraj Bajrang Kamthe vs the State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2025)

¶1

903-ba-611-2025.doc

¶2

Nikita

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

NIKITAKAILASDARADE Digitallysigned byNIKITAKAILASDARADEDate:2025.07.1620:29:47+0530

¶5

BAIL APPLICATION NO.611 OF 2025

¶6

Yuvraj Bajrang Kamthe … Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent

¶7

Mr. Ramanik Pawar i/b Ms. Samiksha Pawar a/w Mr. Rahul Gupta a/w Arti Bajpai a/w Ms. Trupti Jambholkar a/w Ms. Dhanshri J. a/w Mr. Samadhan M. for the Applicant.

¶8

Ms. Veera Shinde, APP for the State.

¶9

CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATED : 16^th JULY, 2025

¶10

P.C.:

¶11

Heard Ramanik Pawar, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Ms. Veera Shinde, learned APP for the State.

¶12

By the present application filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Applicant is seeking bail in connection with C. R. No.241 of 2017 registered with Sangli City Police Station, Sangli for the offences punishable under Sections 166, 137, 177, 182, 193, 195(A), 201, 202, 203, 211, 217, 218 r/w. S. 34 of IPC. Applicant has sought for the following reliefs.

¶13

“ (a) This Hon’ble Court be pleased to release the Applicant/ Original Accused No.1 on certain terms and conditions on bail in connection with C. R. No.241/2017 registered at Sangli City Police Station Sangli District Sangli, lodged U/s. 166, 137, 177, 182, 193, 195(A), 201, 202, 203, 211, 217, 218 r/w. S. 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. in

¶14

¶15

903-ba-611-2025.doc

¶16

Sessions Case No 20 of 2019, before Ld. Additional Sessions Court Sangli on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper;”

¶17

Mr. Ramanik Pawar, learned Advocate for the Applicant reiterates that the Applicant in the present application is seeking bail in C. R. 241 of 2017 registered with Sangli City Police Station, District Sangli which is registered as Sessions Case No.20 of 2019 and is pending before the Additional Sessions Judge Sangli.

¶18

Ms. Veera Shinde, learned APP for the State on instructions of the Investigation Officer present in Court submits that the Applicant was not arrested in the crime referred by the Applicant in paragraph No.9(a) of the bail Application. She tenders a notice dated 11.07.2018 by which the Applicant was called upon to cooperate with the Investigation. Same is taken on record and marked as “X” for identification. Ms. Veera Shinde, learned APP for the State, on instructions of the Investigation Officer states that the Applicant was not arrested in the said crime and that the Investigation Officer does not need custody of the Applicant in the crime referred to in the Bail Application. In view of the statements made by Ms. Veera Shinde, learned APP, Mr. Ramanik Pawar learned Advocate for the Applicant on instructions from the Applicant submits that the bail Application can be disposed off on the basis of the said statements. Statements made by Ms. Veera Shinde, learned APP are accepted. Bail Application No.611 of 2025 is disposed off.

¶19

(ASHWIN D. BHOBE. J.)

¶20

Yuvraj Bajrang Kamthe v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yuvraj Bajrang Kamthe v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Bindya Audram Yadav vs State of Maharashtra

Manisha Houshiram Ethape vs State of Maharashtra

Abhishek Ganesh Jagtap vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Saurabh Rajesh Shingare vs the State of Maharashtra

Rohan Jinappa Bhosale vs the State of Maharashtra

Asif Ibrahim Patel vs State of Maharashtra