Disposed¶3

Pawan Trayambak Ingle @ Pavan Tryembak Ingle v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC20 Mar 2025BA/570/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

S.439 CrPC bail application allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to reapply before the Trial Court after the victim's statement is recorded; Trial Court directed to expedite framing of charges and to record the victim's statement within three months; Bombay High Court, Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction; Amit Borkar, J.; 4 August 2025; applicant Pawan Trayambak Ingle @ Pavan Tryembak Ingle; State of Maharashtra; Goregaon Police Station, Mumbai.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the bail application, with liberty to apply for bail before the Trial Court after the recording of the victim's statement; Trial Court directed to expedite framing of charges and to record the victim's statement within three months of receipt of a copy of the order. ¶3

Pawan Trayambak Ingle @ Pavan Tryembak Ingle vs the State of… — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶3

Issue for consideration

Whether the applicant should be granted bail under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.

¶1

Court's answer

After hearing the submissions and upon a prima facie consideration of the material on record, the Court was not inclined to grant the relief of bail as prayed.

¶1

Ratio / Principle

The present bail application was allowed to be withdrawn, the applicant having sought withdrawal on instructions with liberty to file a fresh application after the victim's statement is recorded.

¶3

Key takeaways

The Applicant shall be at liberty to apply for bail before the Trial Court after the recording of the victim's statement.ratio¶5
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the Trial Court is directed to expedite the framing of charges and recording of the victim's statement/evidence.ratio¶4
The Trial Court shall ensure that the statement of the victim is recorded within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order.ratio

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bombay High Court (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction), Bail Application No. 570 of 2025 (Amit Borkar, J.), decided 4 August 2025: The applicant, Pawan Trayambak Ingle @ Pavan Tryembak Ingle, moved for bail under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 against the State of Maharashtra & Ors. After hearing and a prima facie consideration of the material on record, the Court was not inclined to grant the relief as prayed. On the applicant's instructions, the application was permitted to be withdrawn, with liberty to apply for bail before the Trial Court after the recording of the victim's statement. The Trial Court was directed to expedite the framing of charges and the recording of the victim's statement/evidence, and to ensure the victim's statement is recorded within three months from receipt of a copy of the order.

Pawan Trayambak Ingle @ Pavan Tryembak Ingle v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pawan Trayambak Ingle @ Pavan Tryembak Ingle v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt Dr Hemal Siddharth Mehta vs State of Maharashtra through Office of Public Prosecutor

Nihar Bhalchandra Belosay vs the State of Maharashtra

Nandkumar Gopal Raghuveer and Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Tata Capital Limited vs Taj Traders

Tulsi Sureshbhai Darji and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra Thr the Deputy Registrar Cooptive Societies and Anr.

Highland Gardens Co-Op Hsg Society Ltd. Throu. Venkata Chalapathi Pasupuleti vs Addl Commissioner Co-Op Societies and Ors.