Disposed¶23

Rishabh Rakesh Sharma v. the State of Maharahstra and Anr.

Bombay HC25 Apr 2025BA/5424/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Bail Application No. 5424 of 2024, High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Ashwin D. Bhobe, J., order dated 04-09-2025. Purely procedural/adjournment order: appointment of Ms. Priya Patil as Legal Aid counsel for Respondent No.2; paper book to be furnished by applicant's counsel (Mr. Ramesh Tripathi) within one week; matter listed on 30-09-2025 by consent. No statutes, precedents, issues or substantive rulings.

What did the court decide?

Adjournment by consent of the parties; matter listed on 30th September, 2025; legal aid counsel appointed for Respondent No.2; applicant's advocate to furnish the entire paper book to her within one week. ¶23

Rishabh Rakesh Sharma vs the State of Maharahstra and Anr. — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

16-BA-5424-2024.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

Digitally signed by GAYATRI GAYATRIRAJENDRASHIMPI RAJENDRASHIMPIDate:2025.09.04 19:55:30 +0530

¶4

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 5424 OF 2024

¶6

Rishabh Rakesh Sharma ... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents

¶7

¶8

Mr. Ramesh Tripathi a/w Shruti Tripathi, Manshi Sadhwani, K. Tripathi i/b Ramesh Tripathi & Associates, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. A. A. Palkar, APP for Respondent/State.

¶9

Ms. Priya Patil, Advocate for Respondent No.2 (Appointed through Legal Aid).

¶10

¶11

CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATE : 4^th SEPTEMBER, 2025.

¶12

P.C. :

¶13

By order dated 21^st January, 2025. Notice was issued to Respondent No.2, with a direction to Respondent No.1 to serve the Respondent No.2.

¶14

Mr. A. A. Palkar, learned APP for the State submits that Respondent No.2 is served and a request is received from the Respondent No.2 for appointment of an Advocate under the Legal Aid Scheme.

¶15

Ms. Priya Patil, learned Advocate on the Legal Aid Panel is present in Court. On the request of the Court she has agreed to appear on behalf of the Respondent No.2. The Secretary, High Court Legal Aid Services Committee, High Court Mumbai to take note of the appointment of Ms. Priya Patil, as an Advocate to represent Respondent

Gayatri Shimpi

16-BA-5424-2024.doc

No.2 under Legal Aid Scheme.

¶20

Mr. Ramesh Tripathi, learned Advocate for the Applicant assures the Court to furnish a copy of the entire paper book to Ms. Priya Patil, Advocate for the Respondent No.2 within one week from today.

¶21

Mr. A. A. Palkar to communicate to Respondent No.2 of Ms. Priya Patil being appointed as the Advocate to represent Respondent No.2.

¶22

Ms. Priya Patil, learned Advocate for the Respondent No.2 seeks three weeks time to prepare herself. Adjournment not objected to by Mr. Ramesh Tripathi, learned Advocate for the Applicant.

¶23

At the request of Ms. Priya Patil, learned Advocate for Respondent No.2 and by consent of the parties, list the matter on 30^th September, 2025.

¶24

(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)

¶25

¶26

Gayatri Shimpi

Rishabh Rakesh Sharma v. the State of Maharahstra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rishabh Rakesh Sharma v. the State of Maharahstra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Pravin Ankush Chavan vs the State of Maharashtra

Ravindra Harishchandra Satam and Anr. vs Iffco-Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd., Mumbai

Prashant Ramchandra Digankar vs M/S. Siddhanath Tours and Travels Thr. Prop Mahadeo Dange and Anr.

Naresh Narayanrao Bangar and Another vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Others

Haribhau Dagduji Sonwane vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others

Vijay Vilas Mohite vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.