Vikram Tammana Ghagare vs State of Maharashtra

The applicant came to be arrested in Crime No.443 of 2023 registered at Vishrambag Police Station, District : Sangli, for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 120-B, 201, 385, 143, 144, 147, 148, 149, 504, 506, 212 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3 read with Section 25, 4 read with Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 3(1)(i), 3(1)(ii), 3(2), 3(4) and 4 of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOC Act).

¶11

The applicant is accused No. 8 in the aforesaid crime.

¶12

According to the prosecution, the applicant is a member of

1 of 4

Zeenat Pathan

904-BA-5158-2024.doc

organised crime syndicate formed by accused No.1 Swapnil Malme. The accused No.4 and the deceased were accused in Crime No. 124 of 2019. It is alleged that the deceased, who was on bail in the said crime, was not helping the accused No.4 to secure bail and thus accused No.4 was annoyed with him. It is alleged that he thus entered into conspiracy with accused No.1, who was also in jail at that time in another crime, to kill the deceased. According to the prosecution pursuant to said conspiracy pistols and bullets were procured and on 17.06.2023, the deceased was shot dead.

¶17

I have heard the learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.P.P. for the Respondent-State.

¶18

The bail is sought on the ground of parity. In support of the said ground, the learned counsel for the applicant has placed on record the order passed by this Court dated 9^th October 2024 in Criminal Bail Application No.2117 of 2024. By the said order, this Court has released the co-accused Akshay Babaso Shendage on bail.

¶19

The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the allegations against the applicant are of providing motorcycle

2 of 4

Zeenat Pathan

904-BA-5158-2024.doc

to commit the crime in question. It is submitted that this Court

¶24

has released the co-accused Akshay Babaso Shendage to whom more serious role is attributed of procuring pistols. It is submitted that there are no other criminal antecedents against the applicant.

¶25

On the other hand, the learned APP for the Respondent/State submits that the applicant is involved in serious offence of murder. It is submitted that considering the nature of offence, the applicant may not be released on bail.

¶26

I have perused the charge-sheet. The allegations against the applicant are of providing motorcycle to commit the crime in question. As this Court has released the coaccused Akshay Babaso Shendage, against whom the allegations are of procuring pistols and thus, I am inclined to release the applicant on bail.

¶27

ORDER

¶28

(i) Criminal Bail Application is allowed;

¶29

(ii) The applicant is directed to be released on bail in connection with Crime No.443 of 2023 registered at Vishrambag Police Station, District : Sangli, for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 120-B, 201,

3 of 4

Zeenat Pathan

904-BA-5158-2024.doc

385, 143, 144, 147, 148, 149, 504, 506, 212 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3 read with Section 25, 4 read with Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 3(1) (i), 3(1)(ii), 3(2), 3(4) and 4 of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOC Act), on executing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount;

¶34

(iii) The applicant shall attend the concerned Police Station twice in a month i.e. on first and third Saturday between 11.00 a.m. to 01.00 p.m. till the conclusion of the trial;

¶35

(iv) Liberty is granted to the State to apply for cancellation of bail in case of any breach of conditions;

¶36

(v) Application stands disposed of accordingly;

¶37

(N. R. BORKAR, J.)

¶38

4 of 4

¶39

Zeenat Pathan

Vikram Tammana Ghagare v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikram Tammana Ghagare v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Saifullah Farooque Shaikh vs the State of Maharashtra

Shreyas Sanjay Mane vs State of Maharashtra

Mohan Dnyandeo Jagtap vs State of Maharashtra

Ranjeet Dynadev Jagdale vs State of Maharashtra

Nooralam (Shabbir) Najir Shah vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Aditya Ravi Bhujbal vs State of Maharashtra