Nayeem Bake Khan v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bombay HC30 Jul 2025BA/5130/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail Application No.5130 of 2024, Bombay High Court, Milind N. Jadhav, J., dated 24.03.2025; Applicant Nayeem Bake Khan vs State of Maharashtra & Anr.; IPC 1860 indictment and arrest; court-appointed legal-aid advocate (Preshita Mohan Parab) for Respondent No.2/guardian; directions to HCLSC, service of papers, IO to furnish First Informant details; adjourned to 01.04.2025 'For Directions'; bail merits undecided.

What did the court decide?

No final order on bail; the Court issued procedural directions (legal-aid Advocate appointed for Respondent No.2, service of papers, Investigating Officer to furnish First Informant details) and the matter was stood over to 01.04.2025 under the caption 'For Directions'. ¶¶23

Nayeem Bake Khan vs State of Maharashtra and Anr. — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶¶23

Issue for consideration

Entitlement of the Applicant, who stands indicted and arrested under the Indian Penal Code, 1860, to bail (Bail Application No.5130 of 2024, listed for directions).

¶¶17

Court's answer

In view of the indictment and arrest of the Applicant under the IPC, Ms. Preshita Mohan Parab, Advocate, is appointed as Advocate to represent and espouse the case of Respondent No.2.

¶¶17

Ratio / Principle

The High Court Legal Services Committee of this Court is directed to give the appointment letter and papers of the matter to the appointed Advocate forthwith through legal aid.

¶¶18

Key takeaways

The Advocate for the Applicant is to serve a copy of the Application on the appointed Advocate; Respondent No.2 may give appropriate instructions to be placed before the Court on the next adjourned date.ratio¶¶21
The Learned APP is to inform the Investigating Officer to furnish the details of the First Informant to the appointed Advocate and to give the details of the appointed Advocate to Respondent No.2/guardian of Respondent No.2.ratio¶¶22

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bombay High Court (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction), Coram: Milind N. Jadhav, J.; Bail Application No.5130 of 2024, Nayeem Bake Khan v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr., order dated March 24, 2025. Considering the indictment and arrest of the Applicant under the Indian Penal Code, 1860, the Court appointed Ms. Preshita Mohan Parab, Advocate, to represent and espouse the case of Respondent No.2, and directed the High Court Legal Services Committee to issue the appointment letter and papers through legal aid. The Advocate for the Applicant was directed to serve a copy of the Application on the appointed Advocate, and the Learned APP was directed to have the Investigating Officer furnish the First Informant's details to the appointed Advocate and communicate the Advocate's details to Respondent No.2/guardian. The matter was stood over to 01st April, 2025 under the caption 'For Directions'; the merits of the bail application were not decided in this order.

Nayeem Bake Khan v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nayeem Bake Khan v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Iifl Finance Limited vs G C Raj Fabrics Pvt. Ltd.

Iifl Finance Limited vs Balaji Enterprises

Chemtrade Global Impex LLP vs Bhange Organic Chemicals Pvt. Ltd.

Nanda Paraji Kothere vs State of Maharashtra

M/S. Shantinath Developers (Virar) C/O. Mr. Kirit K. Mehta vs Competent Officer and District Deputy Registrar and Anr.

Bindu Lalchandra Tiwari vs Divisional Joint Registrar of Co. Op Soc and Ors.