Disposed¶20

Tushar Sanjay Khare v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC17 Nov 2025BA/4227/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail withdrawal — Bombay HC (Ashwin D. Bhobe, J.) disposes of Criminal Bail Application No. 4227 of 2025 (Tushar Sanjay Khare v. The State of Maharashtra) as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh bail application before the Trial Court on change of circumstance; underlying Crime No. 103 of 2025, Nashik Road Police Station, Nashik City; offences: Ss.103(1) & 3(5) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, S.4/25 Indian Arms Act, 1959, S.135 Maharashtra Police Act, 1951; application filed under S.483 BNSS, 2023; no bail merits decided; decided 11-12-2025.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw the Bail Application with liberty to file a fresh Bail Application before the Trial Court in the event of change of circumstance. ¶20

Tushar Sanjay Khare vs State of Maharashtra — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Bombay HC (2025)

¶1

20-BA-4227-2025.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 4227 OF 2025

Tushar Sanjay Khare

...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent

¶8

Mr. Amit Pradhan, learned Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs. Shilpa Talhar, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent. PC-1442 Mr. Arjun Gite attached to Nashik Road Police Station, Nashik City is present in the Court.

¶9

CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATE : 11^th DECEMBER 2025.

¶10

P.C. :

¶11

Heard Mr. Amit Pradhan, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Mrs. Shilpa Talhar, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent.

¶12

By the present Application filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (“ BNSS ” for short), the Applicant is before this Court seeking regular bail in connection with Crime No. 103 of 2025 registered with Nashik Road Police Station, Nashik City for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1) & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Section 4/25 of the Indian Arms Act, 1959 and Section 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951.

¶13

Mr. Amit Pradhan, learned Advocate for the Applicant, on instructions from the Applicant, seeks leave to withdraw the

Page 1 of 2

Gitalaxmi

20-BA-4227-2025.doc

present Bail Application with liberty to file a fresh Bail Application before the Trial Court in the event of change in circumstance.

¶18

Mrs. Shilpa Talhar, learned A.P.P. does not object for grant of the request made by Mr. Amit Pradhan, learned Advocate for the Applicant.

¶19

Applicant is always at liberty to file a fresh Bail Application before the Trial Court in the event of change of circumstance. If such Application is filed by the Applicant before the Trial Court on the ground of change of circumstance, the same be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law.

¶20

In view of the above, leave to withdraw the present Bail Application is granted. Criminal Bail Application No. 4227 of 2025 is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.

¶21

[ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.]

¶22

Digitally signed by GITALAXMI GITALAXMI KRISHNA KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR KOTAWADEKAR Date: 2025.12.15 21:00:49 +0530

¶23

Page 2 of 2

¶24

Gitalaxmi

Tushar Sanjay Khare v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tushar Sanjay Khare v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Balu Rambhau @ Ramji Ubale vs the State of Maharashtra

M/S Govinda Industries Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. vs the Central Bureau of Investigation and Ors.

Nishant Pandurang Chaudhari vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Raj Bhagvan Shinde vs State of Maharashtra

Dr Anirudh Chandrashekhar Rao vs State of Maharashtra

Sambhaji Balu Bhote and Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.