Disposed¶9

Raj Chandrakant Jadhav v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bombay HC19 Sept 2025BA/1950/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court; Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction; Ashwin D. Bhobe; 26 June 2025; administrative order; adjournment; paucity of time; office objections within two weeks; ad-interim/interim orders continue; affidavit in reply/rejoinder before next date; batch listing for admission on 17, 18 and 19 September 2025; board serial numbers 42-63 (except 54 & 55), 65-85, 86-93; no merits holding.

What did the court decide?

Continuation of ad-interim/interim orders, if any granted earlier, subject to removal of office objections within two weeks and filing of affidavits in reply/rejoinder, if any, before the next date; matters listed for admission on 17/09/2025, 18/09/2025 and 19/09/2025. ¶9

Raj Chandrakant Jadhav vs State of Maharashtra and Anr. — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Vishal Parekar .. 1 .. common order

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATE : 26^th JUNE, 2025

¶4

Per Court :-

¶5

VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR

¶6

Digitally signed by VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR Date: 2025.06.30 12:32:46 +0530

¶7

At the time of rising at 6.30 p.m. the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.

¶8