Dnyaneshwar Trimbak Patil @ Patil Baba v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court common order dated 11 June 2025 by Ashwin D. Bhobe, J.: hearing deferred due to paucity of time; office objections to be removed within two weeks; ad-interim/interim orders, if any, to continue; affidavit in reply/rejoinder to be filed before next date; matters listed 9-17 July 2025 under 'Due Admission' (serial ranges 20-24, 25-29, 30-36, 38-52, 53-68 except 62, 69-92 except 74). Listing/status record only; contains no ratio decidendi, statutory reference or precedent citation.
What did the court decide?
Continuation of earlier ad-interim/interim orders, conditional on removal of all office objections within two weeks; affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, to be filed before the next date; matters listed for 'Due Admission' on 9, 10, 14, 15, 16 and 17 July 2025. ¶10