Ramesh Vishnu Yadav v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Common order, High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction, dated 14.08.2025 (Ashwin D. Bhobe, J.): adjournment due to paucity of time at 6.00 p.m. rising; removal of office objections within two weeks; continuation of ad-interim/interim orders subject to compliance; affidavit in reply/rejoinder to be filed before next date; listing on 10/09/2025 for admission. No substantive issues, holdings on law, citations, or quantum.
What did the court decide?
Administrative/common order: matters could not be heard at rising (6.00 p.m.) for paucity of time; office objections to be removed within two weeks; ad-interim/interim orders, if any, to continue subject to compliance; affidavits in reply/rejoinder to be filed before next date; matters listed on 10/09/2025 for admission. ¶11