Dismissed¶14
Vart Infracon Private Limited v. Sai Kripa Fitness
Bombay HCARBP/91/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Section 9 Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996; arbitration petition dismissed for want of prosecution; non-appearance of petitioner; matter listed under caption 'For Dismissal'; Infracon Private Limited; Sai Ram Fitness; Sai Kripa Fitness; Sunil Sharma; Chirag Arora; High Court of Judicature at Bombay; Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction; Somasekhar Sundaresan J.; Arbitration Petition No. 88 of 2024; Arbitration Petition No. 91 of 2024; dated October 16, 2025.
What did the court decide?
The Arbitration Petitions are dismissed for want of prosecution, as none appeared for the Petitioner despite the matter being listed under the caption 'For Dismissal'. ¶14