Vart Infracon Private Limited v. Sai Ram Fitness
Case brief
What is this about?
Dismissal for want of prosecution of two Section 9 petitions under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Petition No. 88 of 2024 and connected Arbitration Petition No. 91 of 2024) by Infracon Private Limited against Sai Ram Fitness and Sai Kripa Fitness through partners Sunil Sharma and Chirag Arora; no counsel appeared despite listing under the caption “For Dismissal”; High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction; Somasekhar Sundaresan J.; decided October 16, 2025; no relief granted, no amounts awarded.
What did the court decide?
The Petitions are dismissed for want of prosecution. ¶14