Profectus Capital Limited v. Airbex Systems Private Limited
Arbitration – 'speaking to the minutes'
Case brief
What is this about?
Arbitration; speaking to the minutes; Section 9 to Section 17 conversion; Section 11 Application. Profectus Capital Private Limited v. Airbex Systems Private Limited & Ors., Arbitration Application No. 375 of 2025 with Arbitration Petitions No. 394 and No. 411 of 2025, High Court of Bombay (OOCJ), Somasekhar Sundaresan J, decided November 14, 2025. The September 10, 2025 order disposing of the Section 11 Application had omitted to record the intended conversion of the Section 9 Petition into a Section 17 application; the Court recorded that Arbitration Petition No. 394 of 2025 stands converted into a Section 17 application for consideration by the arbitral tribunal and stands disposed of. Counsel: Nikhil Mehta (Applicant); no appearance for Respondents. Court Receiver personnel present: Swayam Chopda (OSD), Gajanan Surve (Master (Adm.)). Keywords: Section 9, Section 11, Section 17, speaking to the minutes, Court Receiver, arbitral tribunal, Profectus Capital, Airbex Systems.