Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. v. Kamal Madhavdas Rajpal
Case brief
What is this about?
Section 9 Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 interim protection Bombay High Court; ad-interim injunction restraining alienation of borrower's personal assets pending arbitration; risk of dissipation and denudation of subject-matter of arbitration agreement; delivery of possession of financed vehicle (Freelander 2 SD4 HSE, MH14DW0012) to lender-appointed receiver; ex parte relief on defaulting respondent's non-appearance despite notice dated August 10, 2022 and service affidavit March 11, 2025; variation/vacation of Section 9 relief to be sought before Arbitral Tribunal; liberty to file Section 11 application within 30 days; Aditya Birla Finance Ltd v. Kamal Madhavdas Rajpal; claim Rs. 19,28,628/-; Somasekhar Sundaresan, J.; ARBP 116 of 2024; listed April 30, 2025.
What did the court decide?
Ad-interim reliefs in prayer clauses (a) and (b) granted pending arbitration and further interim-relief consideration by the Arbitral Tribunal: (a) temporary order/injunction restraining the Respondent and persons claiming under him from directly or indirectly dealing with, selling, offering for sale, transferring, parting with possession of, delivering, or creating third-party rights in respect of his personal assets or properties; and (b) delivery of possession of the vehicle model FREELANDER 2 SD4 HSE, Chassis No. SALFA2AB2DL910345, Engine No. DZ784087161224DT, Registration No. MH14DW0012, to the receiver appointed by the Petitioner. Respondent may seek variation/vacation of the relief before the Arbitral Tribunal; Petitioner to file Section 11 application within 30 days of upload of the Order.