Monan Maruti Durkule v. Machindra Datttraya Raskar
Case brief
What is this about?
Batch adjournment order (P.C.), High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, dated 17.11.2025, by Arun R. Pedneker, J. Matters including Writ Petition No. 13109 of 2025, Writ Petition No. 9049 of 2024, Second Appeal No. 34 of 2025, Arbitration Application No. 8 of 2025, Arbitration Appeals Nos. 16/37/47-71 of 2025 and 24 of 2024, Second Appeals Nos. 189/262 of 2023-2022, 315/553/53/66/257/13/76/166/200/722 of various years, Civil Applications therein, Civil Applications in ARBAST/23xxx and SAST/2567 of 2025, and Contempt Petition No. 141 of 2016 in WP/3028/2013, adjourned to 05.03.2026, 06.03.2026, 09.03.2026, 10.03.2026 and 11.03.2026; interim relief/undertaking/statement to continue. Useful only for scheduling status; contains no merits determination, no issues, holdings, statutes or cited precedents.
What did the court decide?
Purely administrative adjournment order: due to paucity of time, all matters listed on the board (serial numbers 109 to 192, comprising writ petitions, second appeals with connected civil applications, an arbitration application, numerous arbitration appeals, civil applications in arbitration and SAST matters, and a contempt petition) were adjourned to dates between 05.03.2026 and 11.03.2026, and any interim relief / undertaking / statement was ordered to continue till the next date.