Rushikesh Shivaji Gavhankar v. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench; Division Bench of Manish Pitale and Y. G. Khobragade, JJ.; order dated 11 September 2025; adjournment of a large batch of matters due to paucity of time; matters include writ petitions, PILs, criminal applications, civil applications and letter patent appeals; next dates fall between 09.10.2025 and 15.12.2025; directions that office objections be removed before the next date; affidavit in reply/rejoinder to be filed on or before the next date; ad-interim orders, if any passed earlier, continued until the next date; no merits decided, no issues framed, no statutes or precedents cited; State represented by Government Pleader and Additional Government Pleaders (Girase, Tambe, Kale, Sonpawale, Kagne, Ingole, Kamble, Diggikar); petitioners/applicants not individually named in the text.
What did the court decide?
No merits adjudicated. Due to paucity of time, all listed matters (writ petitions, PILs, criminal applications, civil applications and letter patent appeals) were adjourned to the dates mentioned; office objections are to be removed before the next date; affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, to be filed on or before the next date; ad-interim orders, if any passed earlier, to continue until the next date.