Manoj Kumar Jain v. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-judge administrative order, Aurangabad bench of the Bombay High Court, Coram Neeraj P. Dhote, J., dated 8 October 2025, captioned 'Paucity of Time'. Batch adjournment of numerous Anticipatory Bail Applications of 2025 (Nos. 1085, 1128, 1175, 1194, 1202, 1207 through 1624 and 1678 of 2025, several clubbed with criminal applications) and Application for Cancellation of Bail No. 105 of 2024, to hearing dates 13/10/2025, 14/10/2025, 15/10/2025, 12/11/2025, 13/11/2025 and 14/11/2025. Direction that interim protection/interim relief/undertaking/statement, if any, continue till the next date. State represented by APPs M. K. Goyanka, C. V. Bhadane, B. B. Bhise, N. D. Batule and G. A. Kulkarni. Of evidentiary use only to show pendency of the listed matters and continuation of interim protection; not a ruling on merits.
What did the court decide?
Batch adjournment of all listed matters (principally Anticipatory Bail Applications of 2025 and Application for Cancellation of Bail No. 105 of 2024); interim protection/interim relief/undertaking/statement, if any, to continue till the next date. No relief on the merits of any application.