Sushil Yuvraj Harale v. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Use only for tracking listings/dates. Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench), Division Bench of Manish Pitale and Y. G. Khobragade, JJ., order dated 11-09-2025: batch adjournment 'due to paucity of time' of numerous writ petitions (e.g., WP 450/2019 through WP 8946/2025), PILs (PIL 148/2013 through PIL 64/2024), criminal applications (Crl.A. 1052/2025 through Crl.A. 2991/2025), civil applications and letter patent appeals (LPA 70/2009, LPA 230-231/2011, LPA 234/2011), to dates between 09.10.2025 and 15.12.2025. Directions limited to removal of office objections, filing of affidavits in reply/rejoinder before the next date, and continuation of existing ad-interim orders until the next date. No statute construed, no precedent discussed, no merits adjudicated; counsel appearing throughout are Government Pleaders/Addl. Government Pleaders for Respondent/State.
What did the court decide?
All listed matters adjourned to the dates mentioned against them; office objections to be removed and affidavits in reply/rejoinder, if any, to be filed on or before the next date; ad-interim orders, if any passed earlier, to continue until the next date.