Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Rohini Sanket Dhoka vs State of Maharashtra — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Home
Bombay HC
2025
Rohini Sanket Dhoka vs State of MaharashtraRohini Sanket Dhoka v. State of Maharashtra

Disposed¶Para 8

Rohini Sanket Dhoka v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC4 Sept 2025APPLN/282/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Application No. 282 of 2025, High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction), Ashwin D. Bhobe J., order dated 04-09-2025. Rohini Sanket Dhoka v. State of Maharashtra. Applicant Nos. 3 & 4 (Sanjay Chunnilal Jaiswal, Ramesh Chunnilal Jaiswal) sought leave to withdraw the Application; e-filing blocked by Registry objections (to be cleared in 2 weeks); deletion of Applicants 3 & 4 requested by counsel for Applicants 1 & 2; Respondent No. 2 (unnamed in text) allowed one week to file reply; next listing 26-09-2025. Advocates: Meenaz Mozawala / Zaid Anwar Qureshi (Applicants 1 & 2); Sangharsh with Dinesh Sonawane, Ramesh Golait, Amit Mishra, Rahul Gaikwad, V. Sonawale (Applicants 3 & 4); Tanveer G. Khan APP (State); Rajesh Ranglani / Priyal Sarda (Respondent No. 2). Adjournment-only order; no merits ruling.

What did the court decide?

Extension of one week granted to Respondent No. 2 to file reply before the Registry; matter listed on 26th September 2025. Application otherwise not disposed of on merits.

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Extension of one week granted to Respondent No. 2 to file reply before the Registry; matter listed on 26th September 2025. Application otherwise not disposed of on merits.

Key takeaways

Leave granted to Respondent No. 2 to file his reply; reply to be filed before the Registry within a period of one week from the date of the order.¶Para 7
Matter directed to be listed on 26th September 2025, in view of the request of counsel for Applicant Nos. 3 & 4 and by consent of the parties.¶Para 8

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bombay High Court (Ashwin D. Bhobe, J.), Criminal Application No. 282 of 2025, Rohini Sanket Dhoka v. The State of Maharashtra, order dated 4th September 2025 — purely procedural: counsel for Applicant Nos. 3 & 4 (Sanjay Chunnilal Jaiswal and Ramesh Chunnilal Jaiswal) reported they had e-filed an application seeking leave to withdraw the Application, which could not be registered due to Registry objections, to be cleared within 2 weeks; counsel for Applicant Nos. 1 & 2 indicated instructions to delete Applicant Nos. 3 & 4 from the cause-title (no order recorded); Respondent No. 2 granted one week to file reply; matter listed on 26th September 2025 by consent. No substantive issue decided; no statute or precedent cited.

A

12-APPLN-282-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 282 OF 2025

Rohini Sanket Dhoka ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent

Ms. Meenaz Mozawala h/f Mr. Zaid Anwar Qureshi, learned Advocate for Applicant Nos. 1 & 2.

Mr. Sangharsh a/w Mr. Dinesh Sonawane, Mr. Ramesh Golait, Mr. Amit Mishra, Mr. Rahul Gaikwad, Mr. V. Sonawale, learned Advocates for Applicant Nos. 3 & 4.

Mr. Tanveer G. Khan, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent.

Mr. Rajesh Ranglani h/f Mr. Priyal Sarda, learned Advocate for Respondent No. 2.

CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATE : 4^th SEPTEMBER 2025.

P.C. :

Ms. Meenaz Mozawala holding for Mr. Zaid Quereshi, learned Advocate for the Applicant. She submitted that the present Application is being prosecuted by Applicant Nos. 1 & 2 and she has instructions to delete Applicant Nos. 3 & 4 from the cause-title of the present Application.

Mr. Sangharsh, learned Advocate appears on behalf of Applicant Nos. 3 & 4 and submits that he has instructions to appear before this Court on behalf of said Applicant Nos. 3 and 4 i.e., Sanjay Chunnilal Jaiswal and Ramesh Chunnilal Jaiswal, and to make a statement that both the said Applicants have filed an Application seeking leave to withdraw the present Application on their behalf. He states that the said Application is e-filed.

Page 1 of 2

Gitalaxmi

12-APPLN-282-2025.doc

At the request of Mr. Sangharsh, learned Advocate for Applicant Nos. 3 & 4, the matter was kept post-lunch.

Matter was taken up at 4.45 p.m.

Mr. Sangharsh, learned Advocate for Applicant Nos. 3 & 4 submits that in view of the objections raised by the Registry, said Application could not be registered. He further submits that office objections would be cleared within a period of 2 weeks from today.

Ms. Meenaz Mozawala holding for Mr. Zaid Qureshi, learned Advocate for Applicant Nos. 1 & 2 and Mr. Tanveer Khan, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent do not object for grant of request made by Mr. Sangharsh, learned Advocate for Applicant Nos. 3 & 4.

Mr. Rajesh Ranglani, learned Advocate for Respondent No. 2 seeks extension of time to file his reply. He submits that reply is ready and will be filed within a period of one week from today. Not objected to by Ms. Meenaz Mozawala holding for Mr. Zaid Qureshi, learned Advocate for Applicant Nos. 1 & 2 and Mr. Tanveer Khan, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent. Leave granted. Reply be filed before the Registry within a period of one week from today.

In view of the request made by Mr. Sangharsh, learned Advocate for Applicant Nos. 3 & 4 and by consent of the parties, list the matter on 26^th September 2025 .

[ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.]

Digitally signed by GITALAXMI GITALAXMI KRISHNA KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR KOTAWADEKAR Date: 2025.09.05 17:13:43 +0530

Page 2 of 2

Gitalaxmi

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Prior proceeding
The present Application is being prosecuted by Applicant Nos. 1 & 2, whose counsel stated she has instructions to delete Applicant Nos. 3 & 4 from the cause-title; no order granting such deletion is recorded in this order.¶Para 1
Prior proceeding
Applicant Nos. 3 & 4 filed an application seeking leave to withdraw the present Application, stated to have been e-filed.¶Para 2
Prior proceeding
The withdrawal application could not be registered owing to objections raised by the Registry; counsel for Applicant Nos. 3 & 4 stated office objections would be cleared within a period of 2 weeks.¶Para 5

Parties & counsel

AI extract

applicant
Rohini Sanket Dhoka¶Cause title
Meenaz Mozawala, Zaid Anwar Qureshi
applicant
Sanjay Chunnilal Jaiswal¶Para 2
Sangharsh, Dinesh Sonawane, Ramesh Golait, Amit Mishra, Rahul Gaikwad, V. Sonawale
applicant
Ramesh Chunnilal Jaiswal¶Para 2
Sangharsh, Dinesh Sonawane, Ramesh Golait, Amit Mishra, Rahul Gaikwad, V. Sonawale
respondent
The State of Maharashtra¶Cause title
Tanveer G. Khan
respondent
Respondent No. 2¶Appearances (pre-order)
Rajesh Ranglani, Priyal Sarda

Coram

AI extract

Ashwin D. Bhobeauthor¶Coram/Date line

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Bombay HC
Decided on: 4 Sept 2025 · September
Registered: 11 Jul 2025
Case no.: APPLN/282/2025
CNR: HCBM010372682025
Bench: R. N. Laddha
Disposal: Dismissed as Withdrawn
Case type: Criminal Application

All orders in this case

5 orders share this CNR

18 Jul 2025Order 1 · R. N. Laddha
6 Aug 2025Order 2 · R. N. Laddha
4 Sept 2025Order 3 — this page · R. N. Laddha
26 Sept 2025Order 4 · R. N. Laddha
11 Dec 2025Order 5 · R. N. Laddha

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from R. N. Laddha

Rakesh Shantilal Jain vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
3 Sept 2025
Rakesh Shantilal Jain vs State of Maharashtra
3 Sept 2025
Shrihari Kondaji Shelke vs State of Maharashtra
3 Sept 2025
Rohit Arun Mane vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
4 Sept 2025
Rahul Ashok Brahmane vs State of Maharashtra
4 Sept 2025
Ankush Kanhoji Kashid vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.
4 Sept 2025

Cite this judgement

Rohini Sanket Dhoka v. State of Maharashtra, APPLN/282/2025 (BOM), decided on 4 September 2025.

The Bombay High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Procedural history3

The present Application is being prosecuted by Applicant Nos. 1 & 2, whose counsel stated she has instructions to delete Applicant Nos. 3 & 4 from the cause-title; no order granting such deletion is recorded in this order.
Applicant Nos. 3 & 4 filed an application seeking leave to withdraw the present Application, stated to have been e-filed.

View full history

Bench / Coram

Ashwin D. Bhobe

Parties & counsel