Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Sagar Gautam Sable vs the State of Maharashtra — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Home
Bombay HC
2025
Sagar Gautam Sable vs the State of MaharashtraSagar Gautam Sable v. the State of Maharashtra

Disposed¶139

Sagar Gautam Sable v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC23 Dec 2025APPLN/2509/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench; batch order dated 10 July 2025 by Arun R. Pedneker, J. covering items 901-919, 921 and 922: Bail Applications Nos. 1272, 1276, 1282, 1283, 1288, 1289, 1290, 1292, 1293, 1294, 1296, 1299, 1300, 1303, 1305, 1309, 1327 of 2025; Application for Cancellation of Bail No. 92 of 2025; Criminal Application No. 383 of 2025 in BA/2203/2023; Criminal Application No. 2494 of 2025 in APEAL/236/2025 with Criminal Appeal No. 236 of 2025; Criminal Application No. 2509 of 2025 in APEAL/112/2024 with Criminal Appeal No. 112 of 2024. Applicants include Vikas Bhagwan Bansode, Ganesh Bhimrao Bharati, Rohit Bhagwan Bhalerao, Vivek Alias Sajan Vibhuti Bhushan, Maruti Madhukar Shinde, Qureshi Mohammad Irfan Abdul Rahim, Somnath Prakash Chavan, Imran Alias Immu Ali Liyakat Ali Sayyad, Anil Vishwanath More, Vivek Bharat Bhosle, Yogesh Rameshwar Mutkule, Suraj Raosaheb Kale, Shaikh Aref Shaikh Saber, Tukaram Sahebrao Yadav, Avesh Shah Salim Shah Fakir, Sanket Alias Ganesh Suresh Gangatre, Raju Allas Rajkumar Gurunath Sontakke, Balasaheb Navnath Palve, Namdeo Dadarao Kachkure, Vitthal Balasaheb Khairnar and Sagar Gautam Sable, all against the State of Maharashtra. Direction: notice returnable on 17/07/2025; APP waived service; liberty to file charge-sheet and documents. No statutes or precedents cited; no substantive bail decision.

What did the court decide?

Notice issued to the respondent-State, returnable on 17/07/2025, with service waived by the learned APP; liberty granted to the applicants to file a copy of the charge-sheet and other relevant documents. No bail was granted or refused and no merits were decided at this stage. ¶139

Why is it important?

Notice is to be issued to the respondent, returnable on 17/07/2025, and the learned APP waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent-State. ¶139

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Notice issued to the respondent-State, returnable on 17/07/2025, with service waived by the learned APP; liberty granted to the applicants to file a copy of the charge-sheet and other relevant documents. No bail was granted or refused and no merits were decided at this stage.

Ratio / Principle

Notice is to be issued to the respondent, returnable on 17/07/2025, and the learned APP waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent-State.

Key takeaways

Liberty is granted to the applicant to file a copy of the charge-sheet and other relevant documents in the matter.ratio¶140

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Interlocutory order of the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench (Arun R. Pedneker, J.), dated July 10, 2025, passed on first listing of a batch of twenty-one criminal matters: seventeen bail applications (Nos. 1272, 1276, 1282, 1283, 1288, 1289, 1290, 1292, 1293, 1294, 1296, 1299, 1300, 1303, 1305, 1309 and 1327 of 2025), Application for Cancellation of Bail No. 92 of 2025, Criminal Application No. 383 of 2025 in Bail Application No. 2203 of 2023, Criminal Application No. 2494 of 2025 in Criminal Appeal No. 236 of 2025, and Criminal Application No. 2509 of 2025 in Criminal Appeal No. 112 of 2024. The Court directed that notice issue to the respondent-State, returnable on 17/07/2025; the learned APP waived service of notice; and the applicants were granted liberty to file a copy of the charge-sheet and other relevant documents. No question of bail or cancellation of bail was decided on merits.

A

IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

901 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1272 OF 2025

Vikas Bhagwan Bansode VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Abhaysinh K. Bhosle APP for Respondents-State: Ms. Vaishali Patil Jadhav

AND

902 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1276 OF 2025

Ganesh Bhimrao Bharati VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Abhaysinh K. Bhosle APP for Respondents-State: Mr. D. J. Patil

AND

903 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1282 OF 2025

Rohit Bhagwan Bhalerao VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Jadhav Satej S APP for Respondents-State: Mr. P. P. Dawalkar

... AND

904 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1283 OF 2025

Vivek Alias Sajan Vibhuti Bhushan

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Abhaysinh K. Bhosle APP for Respondents-State: Mr. N. B. Patil

AND

905 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1288 OF 2025

Maruti Madhukar Shinde

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Another

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Kotali Ramji Tukaram APP for Respondents-State: Mr. G. O. Wattamwar

AND

906 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1289 OF 2025

Qureshi Mohammad Irfan Abdul Rahim

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra

Page 1 of 5

901 BA 1272-2025 and oth

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Shah Subodh P. APP for Respondents-State: Mr. D. J. Patil

AND

907 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1290 OF 2025

Somnath Prakash Chavan

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Others

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Kingaonkar Nandkumar Y APP for Respondents-State: Mr. V. M. Jaware

AND

908 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1292 OF 2025

Imran Alias Immu Ali Liyakat Ali Sayyad

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Mahesh P. Kale APP for Respondents-State: Ms. A. S. Mantri

AND

909 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1293 OF 2025

Anil Vishwanath More And Another

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Kote Shubham Sanjay APP for Respondents-State: Ms. P. V. Diggikar

... AND

910 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1294 OF 2025

Vivek Bharat Bhosle

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Another

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Salunke Sudarshan J APP for Respondents-State: Ms. Vaishali Patil Jadhav

AND

911 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1296 OF 2025

Yogesh Rameshwar Mutkule

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Another

Page 2 of 5

901 BA 1272-2025 and oth

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Salunke Sudarshan J APP for Respondents-State: Mr. P. P. Dawalkar

AND

912 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1299 OF 2025

Suraj Raosaheb Kale

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Chincholkar Ganpat Niranjan, Through Legal Aid APP for Respondents-State: Mr. N. B. Patil

... AND

913 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1300 OF 2025

Shaikh Aref Shaikh Saber And Another

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Chavan Umakant Pandit, Q.r. Shaikh, Syed R.m. APP for Respondents-State: Mr. G. O. Wattamwar

AND

914 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1303 OF 2025

Tukaram Sahebrao Yadav

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra

... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. More P. P. APP for Respondents-State: Mr. D. J. Patil

AND

915 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1305 OF 2025

Avesh Shah Salim Shah Fakir And Another

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra

... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Kulkarni Mukul S. APP for Respondents-State: Mr. V. M. Jaware

AND

916 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1309 OF 2025

Sanket Alias Ganesh Suresh Gangatre

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra

Page 3 of 5

901 BA 1272-2025 and oth

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Thorat Nanabhau R APP for Respondents-State: Ms. A. S. Mantri

AND

917 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1327 OF 2025

Raju Allas Rajkumar Gurunath Sontakke

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra

... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Reddy Ajinkya APP for Respondents-State: Ms. Vaishali Patil Jadhav

AND

918 APPLICATION FOR CANCELLATION OF BAIL NO. 92 OF 2025

Balasaheb Navnath Palve

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Another

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Narwade Narayan B. APP for Respondents-State: Ms. P. P. Dawalkar

AND

919 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 383 OF 2025 IN BA/2203/2023

Namdeo Dadarao Kachkure

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Mane Sarthak M APP for Respondents-State: Mr. G. O. Wattamwar

... AND

921 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2494 OF 2025 IN APEAL/236/2025

Vitthal Balasaheb Khairnar

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ghanekar Nilesh S. APP for Respondents-State: Mr. N. B. Patil

WITH

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 236 OF 2025

AND

922 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2509 OF 2025

Page 4 of 5

901 BA 1272-2025 and oth

IN APEAL/112/2024

Sagar Gautam Sable VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ghanekar Nilesh S. APP for Respondents-State: Mr. P. P. Dawalkar

WITH

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 112 OF 2024

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

Dated : July 10, 2025.

PER COURT :-

Issue notice to the respondent, returnable on 17/07/2025. The learned APP waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent–State.

Liberty is granted to the applicant to file a copy of the charge-sheet and other relevant documents in the matter.

( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. )

vj gawade/-.

Page 5 of 5

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Prior proceeding
Item 919: Criminal Application No. 383 of 2025 filed in Bail Application No. 2203 of 2023 (Namdeo Dadarao Kachkure v. State of Maharashtra).¶113
Prior proceeding
Item 921: Criminal Application No. 2494 of 2025 filed in Criminal Appeal No. 236 of 2025 (APEAL/236/2025) (Vitthal Balasaheb Khairnar v. State of Maharashtra).¶119
Prior proceeding
Parent appeal listed 'WITH' item 921: Criminal Appeal No. 236 of 2025.¶125
Prior proceeding
Item 922: Criminal Application No. 2509 of 2025 filed in Criminal Appeal No. 112 of 2024 (APEAL/112/2024) (Sagar Gautam Sable v. State of Maharashtra).¶127
Prior proceeding
Parent appeal listed 'WITH' item 922: Criminal Appeal No. 112 of 2024.¶135

Parties & counsel

AI extract

applicant
Vikas Bhagwan Bansode¶3
Abhaysinh K. Bhosle
applicant
Ganesh Bhimrao Bharati¶8
Abhaysinh K. Bhosle
applicant
Rohit Bhagwan Bhalerao¶13
Jadhav Satej S
applicant
Vivek Alias Sajan Vibhuti Bhushan¶18
Abhaysinh K. Bhosle
applicant
Maruti Madhukar Shinde¶24
Kotali Ramji Tukaram
applicant
Qureshi Mohammad Irfan Abdul Rahim¶30
Shah Subodh P.
applicant
Somnath Prakash Chavan¶38
Kingaonkar Nandkumar Y
applicant
Imran Alias Immu Ali Liyakat Ali Sayyad¶44
Mahesh P. Kale
applicant
Anil Vishwanath More And Another¶50
Kote Shubham Sanjay
applicant
Vivek Bharat Bhosle¶56
Salunke Sudarshan J
applicant
Yogesh Rameshwar Mutkule¶62
Salunke Sudarshan J
applicant
Suraj Raosaheb Kale¶70
Chincholkar Ganpat Niranjan, Through Legal Aid
applicant
Shaikh Aref Shaikh Saber And Another¶76
Chavan Umakant Pandit, Q.r. Shaikh, Syed R.m.
applicant
Tukaram Sahebrao Yadav¶82
More P. P.
applicant
Avesh Shah Salim Shah Fakir And Another¶88
Kulkarni Mukul S.
applicant
Sanket Alias Ganesh Suresh Gangatre¶94
Thorat Nanabhau R
applicant
Raju Allas Rajkumar Gurunath Sontakke¶102
Reddy Ajinkya
applicant
Balasaheb Navnath Palve¶108
Narwade Narayan B.
applicant
Namdeo Dadarao Kachkure¶114
Mane Sarthak M
applicant
Vitthal Balasaheb Khairnar¶120
Ghanekar Nilesh S.
applicant
Sagar Gautam Sable¶131
Ghanekar Nilesh S.
respondent
The State Of Maharashtra¶4
Vaishali Patil Jadhav, D. J. Patil, P. P. Dawalkar, N. B. Patil, G. O. Wattamwar, V. M. Jaware, A. S. Mantri, P. V. Diggikar

Coram

AI extract

Arun R. Pednekerauthor¶136

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Bombay HC
Decided on: 23 Dec 2025 · December
Registered: 9 Jul 2025
Case no.: APPLN/2509/2025
CNR: HCBM030272462025
Bench: Rajnish R. Vyas
Disposal: DISPOSED OFF
Case type: Bail Application

All orders in this case

11 orders share this CNR

10 Jul 2025Order 1 · Rajnish R. Vyas
30 Jul 2025Order 2 · Rajnish R. Vyas
2 Sept 2025Order 3 · Rajnish R. Vyas
16 Sept 2025Order 4 · Rajnish R. Vyas
3 Oct 2025Order 5 · Rajnish R. Vyas
17 Oct 2025Order 6 · Rajnish R. Vyas
7 Nov 2025Order 7 · Rajnish R. Vyas
21 Nov 2025Order 8 · Rajnish R. Vyas
8 Dec 2025Order 9 · Rajnish R. Vyas
23 Dec 2025Order 10 — this page · Rajnish R. Vyas
12 Jan 2026Order 11 · Rajnish R. Vyas

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Rajnish R. Vyas

Vasantrao S/O Shantaramji Pohekar vs State of Maharashtra Thr Pso., Ps Ner Parsopant Tah Ner Dist,. Yavatmal
22 Dec 2025
Najukrao S/O Udebhan Dhande vs State of Maharashtra Thr Pso., Ps Ner Parsopant, Tah. Ner. Dist Yavatmal
22 Dec 2025
Ramesh S/O Manakchand Kahate vs State of Maharashtra Thr Pso, Ps Ner Parsopant Tah. Ner Dist,. Yavatmal
22 Dec 2025
Jijabai Laxman Andhale and Others vs the State of Maharashtra and Another
23 Dec 2025
Sagar Gautam Sable vs the State of Maharashtra and Another
23 Dec 2025
Rahul Vishnu Akolkar and Others vs the State of Maharashtra and Another
23 Dec 2025

Cite this judgement

Sagar Gautam Sable v. the State of Maharashtra, APPLN/2509/2025 (BOM), decided on 23 December 2025.

The Bombay High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Procedural history5

Item 919: Criminal Application No. 383 of 2025 filed in Bail Application No. 2203 of 2023 (Namdeo Dadarao Kachkure v. State of Maharashtra).
Item 921: Criminal Application No. 2494 of 2025 filed in Criminal Appeal No. 236 of 2025 (APEAL/236/2025) (Vitthal Balasaheb Khairnar v. State of Maharashtra).

View full history

Bench / Coram

Arun R. Pedneker

Parties & counsel