Dismissed¶23

Pramod Avinash Shelke v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC23 Apr 2025APPLN/180/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Cancellation of bail; bail condition breach; avoidance of trial/delay; withdrawal of criminal application; liberty to approach Trial Court; POCSO Spl. Court, Pune; Khadki Police Station; Respondent No. 2; Pramod Avinash Shelke v. State of Maharashtra; Bombay High Court Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction; Ashwin D. Bhobe, J.; dismissed as withdrawn; 10 July 2025.

What did the court decide?

Application dismissed as withdrawn; liberty reserved to the Applicant to move the learned Trial Court in the event of any violation or breach of the bail condition. ¶23

Pramod Avinash Shelke vs State of Maharashtra — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Digitally signed ARUNA by ARUNA SANDEEP SANDEEP TALWALKAR TALWALKAR Date: 2025.07.1021:41:49 +0530 901.APPLN180.2024.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 180 OF 2024

¶4

Pramod Avinash Shelke. ... Applicant. Vs.

¶5

The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents. ****

¶6

Ms. Anima Mishra a/w. Mr. Anuj Singh a/w. Ms. Ritu Singh, i/b. Hulyalkar & Associate, Advocate for the Applicant. Dr. A.A. Takalkar, APP for Respondent/State.

¶7

Ms. Vilasini Balasubramanian i/b. Mr. Lalit Waghmare, Advocate for Respondent No. 2.

¶8

Mr. Anand Ruikar, API, Khadki Police Station, Pune City.

¶9

¶10

CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATE : 10^th JULY, 2025.

¶11

P.C. :

¶12

Heard Ms. Anima Mishra, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Dr. A.A. Takalkar, learned APP for State.

¶13

On 7^th July, 2025 time to serve the Respondent No. 2 was extended and the same was made returnable today.

¶14

Ms. Balasubramanian, Learned Advocate appears on behalf of the Respondent No. 2 and seeks leave to file vakalatnama. Leave granted.

¶15

Ms. Anima Mishra, learned Advocate for the Applicant

¶16

¶17

Talwalkar

¶18

901.APPLN180.2024.odt

¶19

amongst other ground had raised the issue of the Respondent No. 2 avoiding the trial, thereby resulting in delay. She was pressing for cancellation of the bail on the said ground, on the last date of hearing.

¶20

Today Ms. Anima Mishra has filed an application dated 10^th July, 2025 seeking leave to withdraw the present Application. Same is taken on record and marked “X” for identification. Paragraph-3 of the Application reads a under :

¶21

“3. Accordingly, I request to this Hon'ble Court to grant me permission to withdraw the present application with liberty to file fresh cancellation of bail before the sessions Court (POCSO Spl. Court, Pune).”

¶22

Applicant is granted liberty to withdraw the present Application. In the event of any violation or breach of the bail condition, the Applicant is always at liberty to move the learned Trial Court. In the event such application is filed, the learned Trial Court to consider the same on its own merits and in accordance with law.

¶23

Criminal Application No. 180 of 2024 is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶24

(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)

¶25

¶26

Talwalkar

Pramod Avinash Shelke v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pramod Avinash Shelke v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Basavraj Advayappa Koli vs State of Maharashtra

Dilip Damodar Vatane vs the State of Maharashtra

Dharyappa Sadashiv Jirankalgi vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Rahul Damodar Ghule vs State of Maharashtra

Saurabh Makardhwaj Mane vs the State of Maharashtra

Baliram Vasant Jamdade vs State of Maharashtra