Harsh Mahesh Thaker and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Respondent No.2 herein on 8^th January, 2020. The Applicant No.1 is her husband, the Applicant No.2 is her mother-in-law and the Applicant No.3 is her sister-in-law. The charge-sheet contains statements of the informant’s Aunts and acquaintances. However, all these witnesses have supported the case of the first informant which she has stated in her FIR. The FIR mentions that she got married with Applicant No.1 on 8^th March, 2018. They came in contact with each other through a matrimonial website. Her contention is that her parents had given her ornaments. They had also given ornaments to the Applicants. She started residing in her matrimonial house. It is not necessary refer to the allegations in the FIR in detail because the parties have settled their dispute.

¶23

The gist of the FIR is that there was harassment at the time of the physical relation between the Applicant No.1 and the first informant. The Applicants were pressurising her to bring Rs.20,00,000/-. They were not happy because she was not getting pregnant. On all these grounds she was ill treated. Finally, she lodged the FIR. But, now the matter is completely settled between the parties.

¶24

The Respondent No.2 has filed an affidavit giving consent for quashing of this proceedings. She has referred to the proceedings taken out by her under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. Similar complaint was lodged by the Applicant No.2 against the first informant under the said Act. The affidavit mentions that after the settlement, both

¶25

2/4

¶26

H.C. SHIV 8.apl640.25.doc

¶27

these proceedings were withdrawn by the respective parties. With reference to the payment which is to be made by the Applicant No.1, the learned Counsel for the parties mentioned before the Court that the amount of Rs.9,00,000/- is already deposited in the Family Court where the divorce proceedings are pending. She will get that amount once the proceedings are finally disposed of.

¶28

In this background, the Respondent No.2 has given her consent through her affidavit for quashing of these proceedings. Respondent No.2 is present in the Court. She is identified by the learned Counsel. She stated before the Court that the matter is completely settled between the parties. She reiterated the contents of the affidavit and submitted that she has no objection for quashing of these proceedings.

¶29

In this view of the matter, continuation of the criminal prosecution will not serve any purpose. Therefore, in the interest of justice and in the interest of the parties, we are inclined to allow this Application. The learned Counsel for the Respondent No.2 submitted that the Applicants had earlier filed an Application for quashing the proceedings on merits but it was not allowed. In the changed circumstance of settlement between the parties the present Application is filed. Considering the interest of the parties, we are entertaining this Application and we are inclined to allow it. Hence, the following order :-

¶30

3/4

¶31

H.C. SHIV 8.apl640.25.doc

¶32

:: ORDER ::

¶33

(i) The proceeding arising out of C.R. No.8 of 2020 registered with Rabodi police station, Thane and pending vide R.C.C. No.313 of 2021 pending before the learned J.M.F.C., 12^th Court, Thane for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 406 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code are quashed and set aside.

¶34

(ii) Criminal Application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶35

(SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.)

¶36

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)

¶37

4/4

Harsh Mahesh Thaker and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harsh Mahesh Thaker and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sanjeev Ramchandra Patil vs the State of Maharashtra

Ansar Abdul Khan vs the State of Maharashtra

Govind Kishan Waghela vs State of Maharashtra

Suresh Apayya Chothe vs the State of Maharashtra

Amol Jaywant Pawar vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Khushi Ajay Sahjwani vs State of Maharashtra