Sangita W/O. Sanjay Rai v. State of Mah. Thr. Pso, Ps Pandharkawda Dist. Yeotmal and Another.
Case brief
What is this about?
Short forum-conversion order, Writ Petition No.56 of 2024, High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench at Nagpur; coram Anil L. Pansare and Siddheshwar S. Thombre, JJ.; dated 15th September, 2025. Petitioner: Smt. Sangita W/o. Sanjay Rai (Mr. J.M. Gandhi, Advocate). Respondents: State of Maharashtra and Another (Mr. A.R. Chutke, APP for Respondent No.1; Mr. I.V. Tambi, Advocate for Respondent No.2). Since cognizance had been taken by the Trial Court, permission was granted to pursue the remedy under Section 482 CrPC rather than Article 226 of the Constitution of India; the writ petition is to be treated as an application under Section 482 CrPC and listed before the appropriate Bench. No cases cited, no amounts, no final merits determination.
What did the court decide?
Leave granted to pursue the remedy under Section 482 CrPC in place of Article 226; writ petition to be treated as an application under Section 482 CrPC; matter directed to be listed before the appropriate Bench.