Surendra Gadling v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court, Criminal Appeal No. 1342 of 2024 (file ref dtg 61-Apeal-1342-2024): appellant Surendra Gadling (counsel: Sr. Adv. Sudeep Pasbola with Advs. Neeraj Yadav, Swaraj Sable, Shivraj Patil, Ramprasad Deore i/b Adv. Rahul Arote); respondents: State of Maharashtra (Adv. M.H. Mhatre, APP) and NIA as Respondent No.2 (Adv. Chintan Shah h/f Adv. Sandesh Patil). Order dated 28.01.2025 by A. S. Gadkari and Arif S. Doctor, JJ.: notice on behalf of NIA waived, time sought to file reply, matter adjourned to 14.02.2025. Purely procedural/interlocutory; no merits, statutes or precedents addressed.
What did the court decide?
Time granted to Respondent No.2-NIA to file its reply; matter stood over to 14 February 2025. No substantive relief adjudicated. ¶15