The State of Maharashtra v. Dashrath Prabhakar More and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Procedural order dated 16.12.2025, High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench (Neeraj P. Dhote, J.), in State of Maharashtra v. Dashrath Prabhakar More and another: State's appeal for enhancement of sentence (Cri. Appeal No. 398 of 2025) heard along with the convict's appeal against conviction (Cri. Appeal No. 33 of 2025) and the State's leave-to-appeal application (No. 82 of 2025). Court appointed Advocate Amit A. Mukhedkar for the Victim, noted service on respondents Dashrath and Bharat, and adjourned for four weeks. Contains no merits ruling, no statutory references and no precedent citations; useful chiefly for party/counsel tracking and procedural status.
What did the court decide?
Procedural directions only: the Court appointed Advocate Amit A. Mukhedkar for the Victim in the appeal against conviction, noted service on Respondent Nos.1 and 2 in the enhancement appeal, and stood the matters over for four weeks. No substantive relief granted or refused at this stage.