Nirali Biren Shah v. Helios and Matheson Information Technology Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
Applications for leave to file appeal were noted as already disposed of by an earlier order dated 20 March 2025, so the Court passed no orders.
What the court decided
16-ALP-188-2024&GROUP.docx
Neeta Sawant
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPLN. FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPEAL (PVT). NO. 188 OF 2024
| Vaishali Biren Shah : Versus : |
…..Petitioner |
|---|---|
| Helios and Matheson Information | |
| Technology Ltd. & Ors. | ….Respondents |
| APPLN. FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPEAL (PVT). | NO. 77 OF 2025 |
| Nirali Biren Shah : Versus : |
…..Petitioner |
| Helios and Matheson Information | |
| Technology Ltd. & Ors. | ….Respondents |
| APPLN. FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPEAL (PVT). | NO. 78 OF 2025 |
| Biren Chetan Kumar Shah : Versus : |
…..Petitioner |
| Helios and Matheson Information | |
| Technology Ltd. & Ors. | ….Respondents |
| APPLN. FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPEAL (PVT). | NO. 79 OF 2025 |
| Biren Chetan Kumar Shah (HUF) : Versus : |
…..Petitioner |
| Helios and Matheson Information |
_____________________________________________________________________________ PAGE NO. 1 of 2 THURSDAY, 20N NOVEMBER 2025
16-ALP-188-2024&GROUP.docx
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vaishali Biren Shah
- petitioner
Nirali Biren Shah
- petitioner
Biren Chetan Kumar Shah
- petitioner
Biren Chetan Kumar Shah (HUF)
- respondent
Helios and Matheson Information Technology Ltd.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court