Shrusti Santoshrao Deshmukh v. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Paucity of time adjournment order; Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench; Neeraj P. Dhote, J.; 24 September 2025; batch covering Criminal Appeal No. 289 of 2024; numerous Anticipatory Bail Applications of 2025 (Nos. 637 to 1577) with linked Criminal Applications; Applications for Cancellation of Bail including No. 76 of 2024 and a further cancellation application of 2025 in ABA/424/2024; interim protection/interim relief/undertaking/statement continued till next date; next dates 06/10/2025 to 10/10/2025; APPs for the State: M. K. Goyanka, C. V. Bhadane, B. B. Bhise, N. D. Batule, S. K. Shirse.
What did the court decide?
Purely administrative adjournment: all listed matters (Criminal Appeal No. 289 of 2024, numerous Anticipatory Bail Applications of 2025 with linked Criminal Applications, and Applications for Cancellation of Bail) adjourned to the dates mentioned against them (next dates falling between 06/10/2025 and 10/10/2025); any interim protection/interim relief/undertaking/statement to continue till the next date. No merits decided.