Disposed¶4

Shakuntala Yogesh Pardeshi and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC20 Jan 2025ABA/3380/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail; Bombay High Court; ABA 3365/2024 & 3380/2024; disposed 20.01.2025 (Manish Pitale, J.); Sessions Court allowed anticipatory bail on 23.12.2024 to Shakuntala Yogesh Pardeshi, Sarika Mayaram Pardeshi, Gaurav Nandkumar Awati and Sharayu Gaurav Awati; liberty to Sachin Deepak Ram to apply to Sessions Court owing to confusion as to his name in FIR; interim orders of 11.12.2024 and 13.12.2024; no statute or precedent cited.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to applicant-Sachin Deepak Ram to approach the Sessions Court for anticipatory bail, if so advised; the applications otherwise disposed of as not pressed following the Sessions Court's grant of anticipatory bail to the other named applicants. ¶4

Shakuntala Yogesh Pardeshi and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

bipin prithiani

¶2

¶3

p4-aba-3365.24 & anr.doc

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3365 OF 2024

¶6

… Saria Mayaram Pardeshi Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra … Respondent

¶7

WITH

¶8

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3380 OF 2024

¶9

… Shakuntala Yogesh Pardeshi & Ors. Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra … Respondent

¶10

¶11

Mr. Sumit Kate for the Applicants.

¶12

¶13

CORAM: MANISH PITALE, J. DATE : 20^th JANUARY 2025

¶14

P.C. :

¶15

. Not on board. Mentioned by way of praecipe.

¶16

In these applications, on 11^th December 2024 and 13^th December 2024, this Court had granted interim orders in favour of the applicants, at a stage when anticipatory bail applications of these applicants were pending before the Sessions Court. It was further clarified that the Sessions Court was to proceed to decide the anticipatory bail applications of these applicants, without being influenced by the fact that this Court had granted interim reliefs.

¶17

Subsequently, on 23^rd December 2024, the Sessions Court

¶18

BIPINDHARMENDERPRITHIANI Digitally signed byBIPIN DHARMENDERPRITHIANIDate: 2025.01.2111:51:05 +0530

¶19

bipin prithiani

¶20

¶21

p4-aba-3365.24 & anr.doc

¶22

allowed the anticipatory bail applications of applicants Shakuntala Yogesh Pardeshi, Sarika Mayaram Pardeshi, Gaurav Nandkumar Awati and Sharayu Gaurav Awati. In that light, these applications pending before this Court are not being pressed on behalf of the applicants, except for applicant-Sachin Deepak Ram. It is informed that the said Sachin Deepak Ram intends to file an anticipatory bail application before the Sessions Court, as there was some confusion with regard to his name being correctly stated or otherwise in the FIR.

¶23

In view of the above, these applications are disposed of, in the light of the subsequent developments, with liberty to applicant- Sachin Deepak Ram to approach the Sessions Court for anticipatory bail, if so advised.

¶24

MANISH PITALE, J.

Shakuntala Yogesh Pardeshi and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shakuntala Yogesh Pardeshi and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Asian Paints Limited vs Saffro Mellow Coating and Resins

Nadeem Majid Oomerbhoy vs 1(A) Riyad Rashid Oomerbhoy and Ors.

Asian Paints Limited vs Saffro Mellow Coating and Resins

Naresh Soni vs Viacom 18 Media Pvt. Ltd.

Janu Zore vs Priya Construction Company

Priya Construction Company vs State of Maharashtra through the Department of Housing and Office of Government Pleader