Disposed¶37

SBI Cards and Payments Services Pvt.Ltd. v. Asish Chamriya

Bombay HC23 Dec 2025N/293/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court; Order XXI Rule 22 CPC; Notice in execution; EXA/315-318/2021 and EXA/344/2021; SBI Cards and Payments Services Pvt. Ltd.; Neogrowth Credit Pvt. Ltd.; affidavit of service not filed; none for applicants; last chance; stand over to 23 December 2025; caption 'For Compliance'; conditional dismissal of Notices and Execution Applications; Rajesh S. Patil, J.; dated 10 December 2025.

What did the court decide?

Last-chance adjournment: matters stood over to 23 December 2025 under the caption 'For Compliance' to enable the applicants to take steps for service of the Notices, with a direction that the Notices and Execution Applications will stand dismissed if no steps are taken before the next date. ¶37

SBI Cards and Payments Services Pvt.Ltd. vs Asish Chamriya — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶37

Issue for consideration

Whether the applicants should be granted a further (last-chance) opportunity to take steps for service of the Notices on the respondents, failing which the Notices and Execution Applications would stand dismissed.

¶37

Court's answer

As a matter of last chance, the matters were stood over to 23 December 2025 to enable the applicants to take steps for serving the Notices on the respondents, to be listed under the caption 'For Compliance'.

¶37

Ratio / Principle

If no steps are taken before the next date of hearing, the Notices and the Execution Applications will stand dismissed on the ground that the applicants are not interested in pursuing the execution applications any further.

¶38

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bombay High Court (Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction), Rajesh S. Patil, J., 10 December 2025 — Five Notices under Order XXI, Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure arising out of Execution Applications EXA/315 to EXA/318/2021 and EXA/344/2021 (SBI Cards and Payments Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Rajesh Tillu, Asish Chamriya, Vinod R Vinkar and Rupesh Mehta; Neogrowth Credit Pvt. Ltd. through Sameer Suke v. Sigrid Ospitalita and Entertainment LLP and 3 Ors). None appeared for the applicants when the matter was called and affidavits of service had not been filed. As a matter of last chance, the Court stood the matters over to 23 December 2025 under the caption 'For Compliance' to enable the applicants to take steps for serving the Notices on the respondents, making it clear that if no steps are taken before the next date of hearing, the Notices and Execution Applications will stand dismissed on the ground that the applicants are not interested in pursuing the execution applications any further. Purely procedural order; no substantive law decided.

SBI Cards and Payments Services Pvt.Ltd. v. Asish Chamriya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

SBI Cards and Payments Services Pvt.Ltd. v. Asish Chamriya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shriram City Union Finance Limited vs Ganesh Vinod Wadekar and Anr.

Shriram City Union Finance Limited. vs Suresh Anand Kadam and Anr.

Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. vs Ramesh Kamble and Vidya Ramesh Kamble(G)

Sayali Sumukh Pathak vs Sumukh Shamraj Pathak

Nafisa Shabbir Mehta Thr Its Poa Shri Kashinath Uttam Chorge vs Mahesh Anant Salunkhe

SBI Cards and Payments Services Pvt. Ltd. vs P P More