Indusind Bank Limited v. Spencer Tours and Travels and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Execution applications and Order XXI Rule 22 CPC notices dismissed for want of prosecution; claimant absent on successive dates despite opportunity and express compliance warning; affidavit of service proving service of notice never filed; Bombay High Court Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction; Rajesh S. Patil, J.; decided 9 December 2025; claimant side comprised Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd., SBI Cards and Payments Services Pvt. Ltd. (three matters) and IndusInd Bank Limited; opposite parties Amarjeet Singh Kulwantsingh SA and Anr., Sunil K Jain, Sandeep S Chaurasia, Spencer Tours and Travels and Anr., and Dignesh Shah; no quantum, costs or precedent discussed.
What did the court decide?
Even on the return date (9 December, 2025) none was present on behalf of the claimants, although an opportunity had already been granted on the last occasion.