Husband challenged a Family Court interim order directing payment of educational expenses and ad-hoc maintenance. Having failed to clear outstanding maintenance arrears as directed, his writ petition was dismissed.
None; writ petition dismissed for non-payment of maintenance arrears.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
921 WP 9407 of 2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.9407 OF 2022 Mr. Amith Manohar Banger … Petitioner Versus Mrs. Sangeeta Amith Banger … Respondent
Ms. Devika M. Purav a/w. Ms. Gita Kasturi, for Petitioner. Ms. Shilpa Joshi a/w. Ms. Sanyukta Kadar, for Respondent.
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATED : 5 APRIL 2024
P.C.:
This Writ Petition is filed by the Husband challenging impugned Order passed on 17 November 2021, in Interim Application No.72 of 2018 by the Family Court, Mumbai. This Court on 28 March 2024 has passed an Order. Said Order is reproduced below :
This writ petition challenges an impugned order passed on 17 November, 2021 passed on Interim Application No. 72 of 2018 by the Family Court, Mumbai.
1
Kishor
921 WP 9407 of 2022.doc
Court directed the husband to pay all educational expenses of daughter and also pay ad-hoc maintenance of sum of Rs.30,000/- per month from the date of filing of the application till the same is decided.
2
Kishor
921 WP 9407 of 2022.doc
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
Digitally signed by KISHOR KISHOR VISHNU VISHNU KAMBLEDate: KAMBLE 2024.04.12 10:44:54 +0530
3
Kishor
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the husband's writ petition against the Family Court's interim maintenance order should be dismissed for non-compliance with directions to pay arrears.
Amith Manohar Banger
Sangeeta Amith Banger
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
