The single-judge High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by a licensee challenging an order directing possession handover and damages. The court refused adjournment due to lack of cooperation and injury claims from the licensee.
Writ Petition dismissed. No cost.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
921.wp.241.2024 (copy).doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.241 OF 2024
Sushant Premdas Gaur ...Petitioner Vs
Manish Gupta And Ors
...Respondents
Adv. Gaurav Pandey i/b. Adv. Divakar Dwivedi for the Petitioner
Adv. Shweta Sharma for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. ( Through V.C. ) Shri. V. G. Badgujar, AGP for State.
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATED : 04 APRIL 2024
P.C.:
1
ADN
The order is corrected pursuant to the speaking to the minutes of order dated 3 May 2024
921.wp.241.2024 (copy).doc
2
ADN
The order is corrected pursuant to the speaking to the minutes of order dated 3 May 2024
921.wp.241.2024 (copy).doc taken by the advocate previously, therefore, she further submits that this Court should not believe the reasons given by the holding advocate for the licensee. Yesterday when the matter was argued for some time, the licensee’s advocate had undertaken to this Court that he will place on record “schedule of payment”.
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
3
ADN
The order is corrected pursuant to the speaking to the minutes of order dated 3 May 2024
Sushant Premdas Gaur
Manish Gupta
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
