Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a writ petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings for recovery of expenses. The court doubted the available law regarding the grant of such liberty and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty contingent on law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:24876
IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
6 WRIT PETITION NO. 9370 OF 2024
Rajesh Baburao Waghmare VERSUS
Vitthal Muktaba Dapke And Others
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. M. A. Manjramkar h/f Mr. Kadam Prasad Balasaheb
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
Dated : October 14, 2024.
PER COURT :-
( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. )
vj gawade/-.
Page 1 of 1
Rajesh Baburao Waghmare
Vitthal Muktaba Dapke
Others
ARUN R. PEDNEKER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
