Petitioner sought a direction that the State respondent decide his pending revision/appeal within a stipulated period, fearing removal from the panel of Auditors. Court disposed of the petition by directing respondent No.1 to decide it within four weeks, parties to appear on 8.7.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
906-WP-9255-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
VASANT ANANDRAO IDHOL
Digitally signed by VASANT ANANDRAO IDHOL Date: 2024.07.03 17:58:13 +0530
WRIT PETITION NO. 9255 OF 2024
Annasaheb Bhupal Chougule ...Petitioner Versus
The State Of Maharashtra Through. The Sec. Co-op Dept And Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.Nagesh Chavan with Mr.Rahul B. Khot for the Petitioner. Mr.R.S. Pawar, A.G.P. for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 – State.
CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J. DATE : 3rd JULY 2024
P.C.:
1 of 2
VAI
906-WP-9255-2024.doc
respondent No.1 to decide the revision filed by the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date this order is presented to him. The parties shall appears before respondent No.1 on 8.7.2024.
(AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)
2 of 2
VAI
1 issue framed by the court
Whether respondent no.1 should be directed to decide the petitioner's pending appeal/revision within a stipulated time to prevent de-panelisation as an Auditor.
Annasaheb Bhupal Chougule
The State Of Maharashtra Through. The Sec. Co-op Dept
Avinash G. Gharote
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
