In this writ petition, the petitioner's counsel tendered a compilation of documents and submitted an application for withdrawal of the petition. The Single Judge accorded consent and disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn with instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:211-DB
901wp9153-23
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
901 WRIT PETITION NO. 9153 OF 2023
SACHIN EKNATH SHIRSATH VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY
AND OTHERS
Mr. V. C. Patil h/for Mr. U. B. Bondar, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. S. K. Tambe ,AGP for Respondents State
CORAM: RAVINDRA V. GHUGE &
Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.
DATE : 5th January, 2024
ORDER:
1.The learned Advocate for the Petitioner has tendered a
compilation of three pages (photostat copies). The same are collectively
marked as ‘X’ for identification.
2. The learned Advocate submits on instructions that the
Petitioner desires to withdraw this Petition in the light of ‘X'.
3. In view of the above, thisPetition is disposed off as withdrawn
on instructions.
( Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )
JPChavan
Page 1 of 1
Sachin Eknath Shirsath
The State of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary and Others
Y. G. Khobragade
Ravindra V. Ghuge
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court