Disposed

Shantanu Bhayyasaheb Pawar v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others

Bombay HC5 Jan 2024WP/8100/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Collectively disposed of five writ petitions and one PIL for which copies were not supplied. The court directed petitioners to deposit fees and supply papers within two weeks to get a seven-week notice period for respondents; otherwise, petitions are to be dismissed without reference to the court by 16.02.2024.

What did the court decide?

Deposit Rs.100 and supply copies within two weeks to get notice; failure leads to dismissal by 16.02.2024.

Shantanu Bhayyasaheb Pawar Vs the State of… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

974-980 copies not supplied (1)

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

974 WRIT PETITION NO. 5954 OF 2023

¶4

SAKHARAM SIDDHAJI GAVALI

¶5

VERSUS

¶6

THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
AND

¶7

975 WRIT PETITION NO. 8100 OF 2023

¶8

SHANTANU BHAYYASAHEB PAWAR

¶9

VERSUS

¶10

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

¶11

AND

¶12

976 WRIT PETITION NO. 11360 OF 2023

¶13

GRAM PANCHAYAT PETHVADAJ THROUGH ITS MEMBER AND

¶14

OTHERS

¶15

VERSUS

¶16

THE UNION OF INDIA
THROUGH SEC. OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND OTHERS

¶17

AND

¶18

977 WRIT PETITION NO. 14343 OF 2023

¶19

MADHAV JALBA MAKALWAD

¶20

VERSUS

¶21

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

¶22

AND

¶23

978 WRIT PETITION NO. 14523 OF 2023

¶24

BHAGYAWAN SHESHRAO PAIKRAO

¶25

VERSUS

¶26

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
 THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS

¶27

AND

¶28

979 WRIT PETITION NO. 14534 OF 2023

¶29

VIKAS RAVINDRA MAHIRRAO

¶30

974-980 copies not supplied (2)

¶31

VERSUS

¶32

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY AND OTHERS

¶33

AND

¶34

980 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 54 OF 2023

¶35

SAAD BIN MUBARAK VERSUS

¶36

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
 THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS

¶37

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND

¶38

Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

¶39

DATE : 5th January, 2024

¶40

PER COURT:

¶41

All these matters are in the ‘Copies not supplied’

¶42

category.

¶43

On the condition that, each Petitioner/Applicant will

¶44

deposit Rs.100/- with the Advocates’ Association of Bombay High Court, at Aurangabad and supply copies of the Writ Petition/Civil Application paper book, within two weeks, office to issue notice to the Respondents in all these matters, returnable six weeks thereafter.

¶45

974-980 copies not supplied (3)

¶46

It is made clear that, if the above directions are not complied with, the Petitions/Applications shall stand dismissed without reference to the Court to the extent of the un-served Respondents.

¶47

Ad-interim relief, if granted earlier, would continue.

¶48

All office objections, if any, shall be removed on or before 15.02.2024, failing which the Petitions/Applications shall

¶49

stand dismissed without reference to the Court, on 16.02.2024.

¶50

(Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)

¶51

JPChavan

Shantanu Bhayyasaheb Pawar v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shantanu Bhayyasaheb Pawar v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahendra Gorakhnath Bhanbahne Vs State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others

Minakshi Narsingrao Sakhare Vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary and Others

Santosh Prabhu Rathod Vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary and Others

Xyz Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Another

Pravin Magan Koli Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sachin Eknath Shirsath Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others