Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner and his advocates failed to appear despite repeated adjournments; liberty granted to apply if desired.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
5.wp.913.22.doc
Ajay
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 913 OF 2022
Kiran Narayan Pawar..Petitioner
Versus
Mohan Annaji Deshmukh..Respondent
None for the Petitioner.Ms. Smita S. Solwat a/w. Mr. B.S. Nayak, Advocates for Respondent.CORAM:MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE:JANUARY 29, 2024.
P.C.:
1. Heard Ms. Solwat, learned Advocate for Respondent. None
appears for the Petitioner.
2. I had heard learned Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. Patil on
15.01.2024 and also recorded the facts in the present case and
expressed my mind to Mr. Patil that this Court was not inclined to
interfere with the impugned order.
3. Considering the facts in the present case, on that date the
Mr. Patil, persuaded me to keep the matter after one week so as enable
him to obtain appropriate instructions from the Petitioner. The matter
was stood over to 22.01.2024 at his request. On 22.01.2024, Petitioner
nor his Advocate remained present despite the matter been called out.
1 of 2
5.wp.913.22.doc
Hence it was adjourned to today. Once again the Petitioner nor his
Advocate on record as well as Counsel are present when the matter is
called out today in the Court.
4. In that view of the matter, Writ Petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution and default.
5. Liberty to the party to apply, if so desired.
6. Writ Petition is disposed.
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
Ajay
Digitally signed by AJAY AJAY TRAMBAK TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE UGALMUGALE Date: 2024.01.29 15:14:47 +0530
2 of 2
Kiran Narayan Pawar
Mohan Annaji Deshmukh
Milind N. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court