Writ petition regarding interest on compensation was dismissed for want of prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear on the adjourned date.
Writ Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution and disposed of. Liberty to apply to parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
226.WP.3157.2007.doc
HARSHADA H. SAWANT (P.A.)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3157 OF 2007
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation .. Petitioner Versus
Kamalabai Vishwanath Bagad and Ors. .. Respondents
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : JANUARY 25, 2024
P.C.:
1. Heard Mr. Vanarse, learned AGP for Respondent.
2. On 18.01.2024, none appeared for the parties and following
order was passed:-
6. Stand over to 25th January, 2024 .”
3. Today when the matter is called out, none appears for the
1 of 2
226.WP.3157.2007.doc
Petitioners and Private Respondents who are essentially the contesting party.
4. Mr. Vanarse, learned AGP appears for Respondent No.3. In view of the above, the Writ Petition cannot be kept pending. Writ Petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution and default.
5. Liberty to apply to the parties.
6. Writ Petition is disposed.
H. H. SAWANT
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
HARSHADA Digitally signed byHARSHADA HANUMANT HANUMANT SAWANT SAWANT Date: 2024.01.2518:31:06 +0530
2 of 2
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation
Kamalabai Vishwanath Bagad
MILIND N. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
