Disposed

Jagdish Amilal Desai v. Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (Mhada) and Anr.

Bombay HC8 Apr 2024WP/911/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought Permanent Alternate Accommodation from MHADA. On instructions, they undertook to make a fresh comprehensive representation for PAA and additional area per MHADA policy; MHADA to decide by 10 May 2024. WP 911 of 2020 disposed of without deciding merits; other petitions listed for detagging.

What did the court decide?

WP 911/2020 disposed on undertaking to make fresh representation to MHADA, to be decided preferably by 10 May 2024; no costs.

Jagdish Amilal Desai Vs Maharashtra Housing and Area… — Property and Title | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

909-OSWP-911-2020+.DOC

¶2

Amol

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 911 OF 2020

¶5

Jagdish Amilal Desai …Petitioner Versus Maharashtra Housing and Area Development …Respondents Authority (MHADA) & Anr

¶6

WITH

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO. 1333 OF 2024

¶8

Ramila Damodar Gohil ...Petitioner Versus Maharashtra Housing and Area Development ...Respondents Authority (MHADA) & Anr

¶9

WITH

¶10

WRIT PETITION NO. 722 OF 2023

¶11

Vasanthi Sanjeeva Bangera ...Petitioner AMOL Versus PREMNATH Maharashtra Housing and Area Development ...Respondents JADHAV Authority (MHADA) & Anr

¶12

Digitally signed by AMOL PREMNATH JADHAV Date: 2024.04.10 10:25:51 +0530

¶13

Mr Manoj Patil , with Archana Patil, i/b Jurists Uno, for the Petitioners.

¶14

Mr PG Lad , with Shreya Shah, for the Respondent-MHADA.

¶15

CORAM G.S. Patel &

¶16

Kamal Khata, JJ.

¶17

Page 1 of 2 8th April 2024

¶18

909-OSWP-911-2020+.DOC

¶19

DATED: 8th April 2024

¶20

PC:-

¶21

1. On instructions, the Petitioners through Mr Patil state that they will make a comprehensive fresh representation to the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (“ MHADA ”) for the allotment of appropriate Permanent Alternate Accommodation (“ PAA ”) as per their eligibility and in accordance with the MHADA policy. This representation may be combined with their representation for additional area to be purchased or acquired on such terms as may be applicable.

¶22

2. That representation is to be made by Monday, 15th April 2024. Once made, it will be decided by MHADA in accordance with law and subject to all considerations of policy, regulations, rules and statute at the earliest possible and preferably by 10th May 2024.

¶23

3. Writ Petition No 911 of 2020 is disposed of in these terms. There will be no order as to costs. All contentions are kept open. We have not addressed the merits of the Petition.

¶24

4. List Writ Petition No 1333 of 2024 and Writ Petition No 722 of 2023 on 30th April 2024. These Writ Petitions are to be detagged.

¶25

(Kamal Khata, J)

¶26

(G. S. Patel, J)

¶27

Page 2 of 2 8th April 2024

Jagdish Amilal Desai v. Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (Mhada) and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jagdish Amilal Desai v. Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (Mhada) and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shamim Hyder Abdul Hafiz and 3 Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra and 4 Ors.

Satidevi Co-Operative Housing Society Vs State of Maharashtra and 6 Ors.

Saifuddin Adamali Arsiwala Vs State of Maharashtra, Urban Development Department, through Government Pleader

Pranali Prakash Chaudhari Vs the State of Maharashtra

M/S Bramhandnayak Associates Thr Partner Milind Shankarrao Kondhare Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Prabhadevi Indraprastha Co-Op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. Vs Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority