Petitioners sought leave to withdraw the writ petition on instructions. The High Court permitted withdrawal, disposed of the petition as unconditionally withdrawn, and vacated all interim and ad interim orders forthwith.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition; interim/ad interim orders vacated forthwith.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902-OSWP-2348-2023.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2348 OF 2023
Shamim Hyder Abdul Hafiz & Ors …Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors …Respondents
Mr Ashutosh Kulkarni , i/b SS Diwan, for the Petitioners. Ms Sweta Shah , i/b AP Kulkarni, for Respondents Nos. 1 & 2. Mr Mayur Khandeparkar , with Ashwini Jadhav, for Respondent No. 4.
SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE
Digitally signed by SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE Date: 2024.04.05 15:12:25 +0530
Mr Karl Tamboly , with Abhijit Patil, for Respondent No. 5. Mr Abhay Patki, Addl. GP , for the Respondent-State.
CORAM G.S. Patel & Kamal Khata, JJ. DATED: 5th April 2024
PC:-
1. On instructions, learned Advocate for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the Petition. Leave granted.
2. The Petition is disposed of as unconditionally withdrawn.
3. Interim or ad interim orders, if any, stand vacated forthwith.
(Kamal Khata, J)
(G. S. Patel, J)
Page 1 of 1 5th April 2024
Shamim Hyder Abdul Hafiz & Ors
State of Maharashtra & Ors
G.S. Patel
Kamal Khata
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
