Interim order in a writ petition against the State; an earlier direction for the Tahsildar's affidavit remains partly unmet. Time granted to file an additional affidavit explaining the 2½-year delay in passing the impugned order after proceedings closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.9055 OF 2024
Deepak Vallabhji Dedhia .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra, Through the Revenue and Forest Dept. and Anr. .. Respondents
Mr. Saurabh Butala, i/by Ms. Manvi Sharma, Advocates for the Petitioner. Ms. Kavita N. Solunke, Assistant Government Pleader for the RespondentState of Maharashtra.
CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR &
RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ DATE : 17TH OCTOBER 2024.
P.C. :
Digitally signed by SNEHA SNEHA ABHAY 60-WP-9055-2024.doc ABHAY DIXIT DIXIT Date: Dixit 2024.10.17 16:18:27 +0530
1/1
Deepak Vallabhji Dedhia
The State of Maharashtra, Through the Revenue and Forest Dept.
A.S. Chandurkar
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
