Petitioner in a writ petition withdrew the matter via a dated letter; the court recorded the withdrawal and disposed of the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KVM
1/1
902 - WP 9033 OF 2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Digitally signed by KANCHAN KANCHAN VINOD VINOD MAYEKAR MAYEKAR Date: 2024.04.25 14:40:30 +0530
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 9033 OF 2022
Sandip Dipak Shelke ….. Petitioner VERSUS Komal Sandip Shelke ….. Respondent
Mr. Vishwesh Gadage i/b. Mr.Chetan G. Patil for the Petitioner. Mr.Kedar P. Lad for the Respondent (Through Video conferencing).
CORAM: RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 24 APRIL, 2024
P.C. :-
Mr.Gadage, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
submits that the petitioner has by his letter dated 19 April, 2024 instructed the advocate appearing for the petitioner to withdraw
the writ petition. A copy of the letter is tendered.
taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification.
[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]
Sandip Dipak Shelke
Komal Sandip Shelke
Rajesh S Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
