Writ petition challenging a Trial Court order dated 5 February 2024 allowing impleadment of third parties as defendants in the petitioner's suit. Notice was issued to respondents with an adjourned return date; the court clarified that any impleadment would remain subject to the final outcome of this petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed ANANT by ANANT KRISHNA KRISHNA NAIKDate: NAIK 2024.07.16 20:21:53 +0530
15.WP.8981.2024 .doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 8981 OF 2024
Dattatray Shivram Bhosale ....Petitioner V/S Maharashtra State Farming Corporation And Ors ....Respondents
Mr. Vaibhav Ugle a/w. Mr. Vikas Somawanshi, Mr. Roshan Chavan i/b. Mr Sohel A. Mujawar for Petitioner None for the Respondents
CORAM : M. M. SATHAYE, J.
DATED : 16 JULY 2024
P.C.:
by the Trial Court, by which the application of third party (the Respondent Nos. 2 to 4C) for impleadment is allowed.
referred to certain documents produced by the Petitioner/Plaintiff himself with list of documents Exhibit 14.
1/2
akn
15.WP.8981.2024 .doc
addition to the Court’s notice, private notice is permitted.
2/2
akn
1 issue framed by the court
Whether third-party impleadment in a suit, allowed by the Trial Court on documents produced via Exhibit 14, should stand.
Dattatray Shivram Bhosale
Maharashtra State Farming Corporation
Respondent Nos. 2 and 3
M. M. Sathaye
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
