Ramnath Narayandas Kalra and Ors. v. Podar Education Society Thr. Dipak Didwaniya
Case brief
What is this about?
Listed writ petition for hearing on merits. Court expressed tentative view not to interfere with impugned order. Petitioners' counsel requested time to review lease deed and MoU. Matter adjourned.
What the court decided
24-wp-8972-2024.doc
Vina Khapde (P.S.)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.8972 OF 2024
Ramnath Narayandas Kalra and ors .. Petitioners Versus
- Podar Education Society .. Respondents
- Mr. V. R. Dube i/b. Mr. A. K. Upadhyay a/w Mr. Rohan Kharat for the Petitioners.
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : JULY 26, 2024
P.C.:
1. Heard Mr. Dube, the learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioners.
2. After expressing my mind to the learned Advocate for the Petitioners that this Court shall not interfere with the impugned order, the learned Advocate would submit that he requires some time to take instructions and also go through the lease deed and correspondence between the parties to ascertain the fact whether the lease deed had superseded the MoU or otherwise.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ramnath Narayandas Kalra and ors
- respondent
Podar Education Society
Coram
MILIND N. JADHAV
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court