Disposed

Prof. Arun Bapurao Degaonkar v. State of Maharashtra Thr Prin. Secretary, Higher and Technical Education and Ors.

Bombay HC26 Aug 2024WP/8901/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Two writ petitions concerning post-retirement benefits of petitioners. Court listed them with connected writ petitions on 15 July 2024, refused ad-interim order, and directed respondents to process post-retirement benefit papers only after seeking leave of the Court.

What did the court decide?

Petitions listed with connected matters; no ad-interim order; respondents may process post-retirement benefit papers only after leave of Court.

Prof. Arun Bapurao Degaonkar vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

JPP

¶2

1 19-20. WP 8900-8901.24-corrected.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 8900 OF 2024

¶5

Vijay Shivaji Shingate … Petitioner V/s.

¶6

State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary, Higher and Technical Education and Ors.

¶7

... Respondents

¶8

and

¶9

WRIT PETITION NO. 8901 OF 2024

¶10

Prof. Arun Bapurao Degaonkar … Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary, Higher and Technical Education and Ors. ... Respondents

¶11

Mr. C.G. Gavnekar for the Petitioner in both Petitions

¶12

Ms. Anjali Helekar for Respondent No.7 (AICTE) in both Petitions Mr. B.V. Samant, Addl. G.P. with Mr. V.G. Badgujar, AGP for the Respondent - State

¶13

CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ.

¶14

DATE : 02 JULY 2024

¶15

P.C. :-

¶16

The learned Counsel for the Petitioners states that

¶17

connected Writ Petition Nos. 16125 of 2023 and 16126 of 2023 are due on 15 July 2024.

¶18

This order is corrected vide Speaking to Minutes order dated 18 July 2024

¶19

2 19-20. WP 8900-8901.24-corrected.doc

¶20

JPP

¶21

List the Writ Petitions on 15 July 2024 along with the Writ Petition Nos. 16125 of 2023 and 16126 of 2023

¶22

As regards the prayer for ad-interim order is concerned, in the Writ Petition Nos. 16125 of 2023 and 16126 of 2023, after considering the arguments in detail, we had refused the ad-interim order. Therefore, no ad-interim order.

¶23

The learned counsel for the Petitioners, proceeding on the basis that the Respondents may process the papers for post retirement benefits and disburse the amounts to the Petitioners, submitted that they should be restrained from doing so as it would affect the merits of the Petitioners’ case. The Respondents to process the papers for post retirement benefits of the Petitioners only after seeking leave of the Court.

¶24

M.M. SATHAYE, J. NITIN JAMDAR, J.

¶25

Digitally signed JYOTIPRAKASH by JYOTIPRAKASHPAWAR PAWAR Date: 2024.07.20 10:37:57 +0530

¶26

This order is corrected vide Speaking to Minutes order dated 18 July 2024

Prof. Arun Bapurao Degaonkar v. State of Maharashtra Thr Prin. Secretary, Higher and Technical Education and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prof. Arun Bapurao Degaonkar v. State of Maharashtra Thr Prin. Secretary, Higher and Technical Education and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mohammad Aajam Mehemud Patel and Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Sectretary Rural Development and Ors.

Pradip Mahadev Mandavkar vs the State of Maharashtra Thr the Secretary and Ors.

Laxmikant Lalmani Sharma vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Vinod S/O Janardan Aawari an Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra Throu. Its Principal Sec. School Education and Sports Dept and Ors.

Vijay Shivaji Shingate vs State of Maharashtra Thr Prin. Secretary, Higher and Technical Edu. and Ors.

Santosh Chandru Thorat vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.